The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2056 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
It might be that the Biometrics Commissioner’s work profile has changed since that session.
I am a bit concerned about the process. You mentioned the corporate body bearing down—rightly—and asking probing questions about some of the bids. The figures would be much higher across all the different areas—an additional 5 per cent was alluded to—had the corporate body not done its work. Is there a problem in the way that this works? Office-holders present you with bids rather than being told, “Here’s your budget. This is what you’re getting. You’ve got to be efficient enough to deal with it.”
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Given the work that the committee has undertaken on the office-holder landscape, you will understand why we were quite disappointed to see the costs continuing to rise quite considerably. It feels as though the Parliament has pulled up the drawbridge slightly, but we still have an existing problem, given that the costs are continuing to rise.
You mentioned some potential future options with regard to shared facilities. I frequently notice that parts of the Parliament building are quite empty for much of the week, because, I assume, people are working remotely or from home. What options are being looked at to try to make better use of the estate and bring some office-holders on to the campus?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
In answers to my original questions, minister, you leaned heavily on the robust methodology for the selection of the investment zones. Can you tell me the date on which that methodology was agreed?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Were none of your officials who are with you today involved in that discussion?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Was there any application process?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Do you have a desk occupancy rate for the campus?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
Did it all happen in one phone call between ministers—that is, the methodology and the allocation of where in Scotland that money was to go?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
The allocation was made on 22 June 2023, I think, and then it was announced that Glasgow and Aberdeenshire had qualified. However, it appears that the only correspondence between Glasgow City Council and Scottish Government ministers happened that morning—a letter was sent to Scottish Government colleagues on 22 June. The idea that you can write in the morning and get £80 million of funding by the afternoon is a bit of a joke, really, isn’t it? The convener began to set out some general concerns about certain regional issues—displacement issues, for example, and how these things might work—but surely there has to be full transparency with regard to how such decisions are made and whether there has been proper evaluation of the economic impact and potential.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
It strikes me that, at the time—in June 2023—the principal metric was probably the fact that there were Conservative seats at risk in Aberdeenshire and Scottish National Party seats at risk in Glasgow. Those were probably, first and foremost, the issues that the two Governments, working together, looked at in cutting out other parts of the country, if I am being honest.
Such an approach leads to that sort of issue being raised. The minister might disagree with my interpretation—I am sure that he does—but, if you do not have full transparency and a proper process in which people can develop bids based on the full economic potential of their areas, is that not a problem? Indeed, are you able to realise the full economic potential of that kind of investment if you do not have proper external bidding transparency based on long-term economic planning?
11:30Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Michael Marra
I was struck by the evidence of the Biometrics Commissioner—he was sitting where you are, Mr Carlaw—who told us that there could very easily be an end to his work. The body had to complete certain pieces of work, but, at their conclusion, it could pretty much pull down the doors and say, “We’re done here.” Have any of the office-holders indicated to you that they feel that their work is done?