The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1491 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
Minister, how important is a transparent application and assessment process to the strength of the bids?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
We are investigating the potential benefits and value for money for taxpayers of such approaches; as a committee, we also have a general interest in Government decision-making processes. It strikes me that a very different approach was taken for investment zones. No process was put in place. On the day that the investment zones were announced, Russel Griggs of South of Scotland Enterprise wrote that he was bitterly disappointed and that he was still awaiting the publication of the selection criteria. People find that confusing.
I will provide some context, and it would be useful to hear the minister’s reflections. My home city of Dundee has been awarded neither green freeport status nor an investment zone, despite being the fourth-largest city in the country. We have the most prestigious and high-achieving life sciences institution in the whole of the UK, we have an outstanding port and we have huge economic need, yet neither of those opportunities has been delivered. Can the Government provide a justification for that?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
In that case, I will ask about the generality of the situation. Is what has happened not an inevitable consequence of doing these things on a specific regional basis, rather than taking a national approach? You are here today to talk about a localised, regional approach to economic development, whereby the Government is making certain decisions about how to lift up certain areas. Are we not in a situation in which, essentially, the investment zones are just pork? Is this not just a case of pork-barrel politics, with the Scottish National Party and the Tories deciding to allocate the zones to areas of political priority? Does such an approach not open up that possibility?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
That is useful detail. It is in stark contrast to the process that was followed by the Government for investment zones, on which Neil Gray said in response to a written question from me:
“The invitation to host an Investment Zone was not subject to a bidding or application process”.—[Written Answers, 20 July 2023; S6W-19604.]
Minister, you said that it was “incredibly important” to have a proper process. Why was that approach not followed for investment zones?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
Could you outline why the STUC’s submission is critical of the resource spending review that was previously published by the Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
The permanent secretary gave evidence to the committee on 16 May. He told us that it was not clear to him what the status of the resource spending review was within Government. At that time, the new First Minister had not given him any kind of direction. Do you understand what the current status of the resource spending review is?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
To be clear, minister, I am in favour of locally based regional economic development, but there must be transparency and criteria must be applied. Your Government has two very different policies—one involves the criteria that you have set out today while the other completely lacks any criteria or process.
I do not want to labour the point any further, but it would be helpful if the minister and his colleagues could set out, in writing, the rationale for the distinctly different approaches to the two different policies. I would welcome that, and it would be useful in helping us to assess the general impact of the policies.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Michael Marra
That is a fair point. The permanent secretary raised the issue of capacity and the ability of the civil service to be able to deliver plans. For instance, within the first two years of a Labour government, Labour is committed to building towards £28 billion of investments in green technology across the UK. We have to be in a position as a country to develop those plans. Do you have concerns about our capacity as a country to meet the aspiration of a new government to make those investments?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Michael Marra
It is a significant area of public investment. Who would you expect to be doing that analysis? If increased productivity is one of the aims of the Government’s investment of taxpayers’ money in that area, we should be seeing those numbers.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Michael Marra
The essence of the Scottish Property Federation’s submission is a concern about whether the plans can be delivered, and you mention the timeframe. How robust does the evaluation of applications have to be in order to make sure that we can deliver them? Do we need a robust process to evaluate the plans that are put forward?