Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 14 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1491 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

Minister, how important is a transparent application and assessment process to the strength of the bids?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

We are investigating the potential benefits and value for money for taxpayers of such approaches; as a committee, we also have a general interest in Government decision-making processes. It strikes me that a very different approach was taken for investment zones. No process was put in place. On the day that the investment zones were announced, Russel Griggs of South of Scotland Enterprise wrote that he was bitterly disappointed and that he was still awaiting the publication of the selection criteria. People find that confusing.

I will provide some context, and it would be useful to hear the minister’s reflections. My home city of Dundee has been awarded neither green freeport status nor an investment zone, despite being the fourth-largest city in the country. We have the most prestigious and high-achieving life sciences institution in the whole of the UK, we have an outstanding port and we have huge economic need, yet neither of those opportunities has been delivered. Can the Government provide a justification for that?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

In that case, I will ask about the generality of the situation. Is what has happened not an inevitable consequence of doing these things on a specific regional basis, rather than taking a national approach? You are here today to talk about a localised, regional approach to economic development, whereby the Government is making certain decisions about how to lift up certain areas. Are we not in a situation in which, essentially, the investment zones are just pork? Is this not just a case of pork-barrel politics, with the Scottish National Party and the Tories deciding to allocate the zones to areas of political priority? Does such an approach not open up that possibility?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

That is useful detail. It is in stark contrast to the process that was followed by the Government for investment zones, on which Neil Gray said in response to a written question from me:

“The invitation to host an Investment Zone was not subject to a bidding or application process”.—[Written Answers, 20 July 2023; S6W-19604.]

Minister, you said that it was “incredibly important” to have a proper process. Why was that approach not followed for investment zones?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

Could you outline why the STUC’s submission is critical of the resource spending review that was previously published by the Government?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

The permanent secretary gave evidence to the committee on 16 May. He told us that it was not clear to him what the status of the resource spending review was within Government. At that time, the new First Minister had not given him any kind of direction. Do you understand what the current status of the resource spending review is?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

To be clear, minister, I am in favour of locally based regional economic development, but there must be transparency and criteria must be applied. Your Government has two very different policies—one involves the criteria that you have set out today while the other completely lacks any criteria or process.

I do not want to labour the point any further, but it would be helpful if the minister and his colleagues could set out, in writing, the rationale for the distinctly different approaches to the two different policies. I would welcome that, and it would be useful in helping us to assess the general impact of the policies.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Public Service Reform Programme

Meeting date: 12 September 2023

Michael Marra

That is a fair point. The permanent secretary raised the issue of capacity and the ability of the civil service to be able to deliver plans. For instance, within the first two years of a Labour government, Labour is committed to building towards £28 billion of investments in green technology across the UK. We have to be in a position as a country to develop those plans. Do you have concerns about our capacity as a country to meet the aspiration of a new government to make those investments?

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Publications)

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

Michael Marra

It is a significant area of public investment. Who would you expect to be doing that analysis? If increased productivity is one of the aims of the Government’s investment of taxpayers’ money in that area, we should be seeing those numbers.

Finance and Public Administration Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 5 September 2023

Michael Marra

The essence of the Scottish Property Federation’s submission is a concern about whether the plans can be delivered, and you mention the timeframe. How robust does the evaluation of applications have to be in order to make sure that we can deliver them? Do we need a robust process to evaluate the plans that are put forward?