The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1825 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Good morning, colleagues. Starting with the fiscal sustainability delivery plan, Mr Robinson, I note that you mention in your submission several areas where you think that more detail is required on the policy specifics. Can you say a little bit about those areas for the committee?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
My question is on the point that Michael Kellet just made about the relationship with the core health spend. You are saying that it does not all go in one direction. However, surely, if there is a cut—for instance, the financial sustainable delivery plan proposes a 3 per cent annualised cut for health boards—there will be an impact on public health. As an organisation, do you have any clarity on what that 3 per cent cut means, how it will be driven through and whether it will impact your own activities?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
I should start by saying that, compared with the convener, I have fewer concerns about my eyesight.
What do you believe are the most significant medium-term risks to the Scottish economy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you.
12:45Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
The committee is very much cognisant of the fact that the fiscal situation has been very volatile in previous years, but I would note that the document is written as a list of actions to be taken in the short run instead of, say, looking at tolerance, setting out some list of assumptions or any analysis of the background or saying, for example, “If we assume productivity growth of such and such per cent versus whatever, it allows us to obtain this output for that input.” It is—and I realise that this was part of the commentary from both of you—very much focused on inputs rather than outputs; in other words, it is really about managing the top level instead of seeing what the outcome is. Is that a fair description?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
That relates to the operational side of things, and I do not think that we have any clarity on any of that. However, the more macro issue is that this “3% recurring savings” action has been written into the document almost as an assumption that those savings will be made in order to meet a target—that is, this £1 billion target that seems to have been set—while, at the same time, it is assumed that health spend will continue to grow. Do you have an understanding of how those two things interact?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Given that commentary, and given your concerns about the programmes, if, during the budget period, the cabinet secretary were to say to us, “This £1 billion cut has been baked in to close the gap,” would that be an acceptable approach from the Government?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
Finally, on the MTFS, I think that Mr Sousa mentioned the lack of prioritisation that the convener highlighted; indeed, I think that both of you referred to it in your submissions. Mr Sousa, you say that assuming no prioritisation cannot
“in practice ... really be true, and the MTFS thus continues to seem more like a political statement to manage expectations across the public sector rather than a true setting of the course of public finances”.
Is that a tenable position for the Government to take? Should we see that in the spending review when it is published? Do we need to see some departure in approach to the management of those public accounts?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
We all recognise that the external funding situation has been volatile globally for a long time now. However, what the UK Government and, we are told, the Scottish Government are trying to do through the spending review process is to add some form of medium-term stability for organisations. What has SCVO’s involvement in the spending review process been? Have you been brought into conversations about the process and what you see as likely outcomes of it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Michael Marra
So, you have no real sight of the process. You are a key partner in the delivery of some services and you are asking for some form of stability around that. It strikes me that, if multiyear funding does not happen in this spending review, it will never happen under this Government. This is the period where there is foresight of three years across UK Government funding. We are told that that should be stable—although there are always events and all that comes with those—so now is surely the opportunity.