The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Why were those accounts not presented to the UEG?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
A false minute was sent to court that the UEG signed off. Again, I am not hearing any rationale for that. I will ask court in a second. There seems to have been a culture in which there was no real faith in the oversight and governance mechanisms. You saw it as a pliant organisation that was not asking the right questions. To some extent, you were counting on that, and you were happy to send it false information.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Do you think that aiming to be an organisation with a turnover of £500 million after 10 years of financial distress was a good strategic posture? Did you agree with that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
So you were not a leader; you were a check and a balance. Is that right? You did not really have a vision for where the institution should go.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I am sorry, but what does that mean?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
In her evidence, Wendy Alexander said that, at the June meeting, she asked for that figure to be 35 per cent. However, it was not changed—it remained at 25 per cent. Why was her advice disregarded, given the public warnings?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Is it correct that the budget continued to be based on a 25 per cent reduction?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Those savings were not being realised, were they?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
You thought that the university should be more public about its situation.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is directly contrary to what Professor O’Neill told me. He said that you were advocating for silence with the staff and for a culture of cover-up, secrecy, suppression of papers for the court that you were running, and a complete lack of transparency about the conduct of court business and the dealings of the university. That is the culture that we are seeing, on top of the incompetence, is it not?