Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2160 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

At our meeting on 24 February, a colleague from the Scottish Funding Council said:

“At the moment, we have only level 2 figures for future years, and we cannot issue multiyear allocations to institutions on that basis. We would very much welcome greater certainty and clarity on multiyear funding.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 24 February 2026; c 14.]

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

The convener is quite pleased about that one. Are there no ministerial directions in relation to the budget?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

The same report says that hospital activity is still below pre-pandemic levels, despite the fact that there are 14 per cent more staff. I think that that makes your point, cabinet secretary.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

That is from the “Public Sector Employment in Scotland Statistics for 3rd Quarter 2025”.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

The policy has not been followed with regard to clawback, either. An overshoot in the first two years would have had to be clawed back in the subsequent year, but that did not happen, did it?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Public Administration in the Scottish Government

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

According to the terms of the policy, that was meant to happen in the second year, but it did not.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

What purpose did you seek to achieve through the Scottish spending review? What was the objective that you set for your Government?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

So, it was more about giving sight of projected figures rather than indicating the Government’s intent.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

Good morning, cabinet secretary. Following the spring statement, there will be an additional £542 million of revenue available for 2026-27. As you have set out, the capital increase is much smaller. Will that additional money help to avoid an emergency budget? The Institute for Fiscal Studies and the Fraser of Allander Institute have both predicted that an emergency budget will be necessary. I imagine that you would take umbrage with their predictions. Will that money help to avoid such a scenario?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review and Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 10 March 2026

Michael Marra

I will maybe come back to that.

You will have been concerned by the analysis by the Fraser of Allander Institute and the Institute for Fiscal Studies. We regularly receive commentary and evidence from them and this committee rightly takes their opinions very seriously. They are identifying what they are calling “heroic assumptions” in terms of efficiency savings in parts of the public sector and real concerns about pay, which has obviously been outlined already. What have you taken from their analysis when you have looked at it and reflected on it?