The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
People are travelling to Switzerland, at the moment.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
My question to Claire Mack is on the allocation of money to renewables. The committee has received various pieces of evidence suggesting that the ScotWind money has been used as a second reserve by the Government. It looks like we are beginning to get a commitment to spend that money on what it was intended for, which is the creation of jobs, particularly in the north-east of Scotland but also across the country. I welcome that.
What kind of projects do you see that money being committed against? You have talked about ring fencing, but can you give us some examples of what it should be funding and when those projects will be possible?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
I want to start with the issue of the comparators that you selected, which has been partly covered. Why did you choose to base the numbers more on what has happened in the US than on what has happened in Australia?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
Would it not have been better if you had presented the anticipated cost as a range of numbers? You have given an anticipated figure, but would it not have been better if you had said that the figure could vary, given the significantly higher totals that are available in other jurisdictions—for example, in Australia, which has a more comparable system? Would it not have been better to have laid out your figures in such a way as to say, “The cost could be as low as this, but it could be as high as that number over there”?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
It is quite a restricted range, compared with what the evidence says.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
But the bill will have an impact in that respect, given the way that the debate has been led.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
It is not clear whether people will have access to legal aid to meet the costs, but according to some estimates, it could cost people tens of thousands of pounds to access a judgment. When it comes to the trade-off between meeting those costs or coming to Scotland and getting the treatment as it is proposed under your bill, surely there will be a cross-border flow of people in that respect.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
You understand my point, however, that people are prepared to travel for it to happen—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Marra
I think that that makes my point, in that that would require extra money.