The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1489 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
From my interaction with the system, it strikes me that it is a fairly straightforward piece of software, to say the least. To an extent, IT procurement costs will be what they will be. I am sure that you are going out to ensure that you get the best price that is available. I understand Jackson Carlaw’s point that the SPCB is implementing the will of the Parliament, and I have no problem at all with the idea of transparency in the area—I am a great supporter of it. However, as you develop the outline business case, is any analysis being done of the use of the system and its efficacy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
So, the system will be more automated.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
Do we have any indication of the broader behaviour change of lobbyists and parliamentarians and of the better outcomes for citizens as a result of the legislation?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
It might be worthwhile to pass on the information that you receive from the analysis undertaken to inform the outline business case, to act as a prompt for post-legislative scrutiny. As I have said, we have no problem at all with the principle, but we want to ensure that the system is as effective as possible. Parliament has agreed it, but if the amount of traffic is limited or it is not encouraging behaviour change in how things operate, I would have thought—I am going back to this theme—that we would want to have some view of that, via post-legislative scrutiny, if there is the capacity to do so.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
I am asking you whether the SNP councillors should withdraw the proposals.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
Yes, there is a “but”. Universities Scotland says that higher education is actually facing a 0.7 per cent real-terms cut to its funding, and it struggles to see where the 3.5 per cent figure comes from. Perhaps you have combined a £12.97 million increase in cash with repurposing money that was already in the system. In that bubble, there was £14.5 million that was a hangover from the Covid situation. Is that how you came to the figure of 3.5 per cent?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
I think that the 22 per cent real-terms reduction is across the past five years, and half of it has been across the past two years. That is my understanding of the allocations that you have made.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
Perhaps you could set that out in writing.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
As has already been highlighted, that is incredibly important to growth in the economy.
On the colleges side, the chief executive of Colleges Scotland said that the
“Budget fails to recognise the vital role colleges play in driving economic growth”
and that
“the Scottish Government’s continued disinvestment in such a cornerstone of the education and skills sector is deeply troubling.”
In the short term, this budget is about doing little harm, some people might say, but in the longer term it is about whether we are disinvesting in our future as a country. Does that trajectory and the shape of the budget not trouble you?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Michael Marra
I will finish by remaining with Dundee, unsurprisingly, and ask about pupil equity funding. Last week, the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills told the Education, Children and Young People Committee that the PEF
“funding stream has become absolutely essential to the way in which schools are now run.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 8 January 2025; c 11.]
There is yet another very significant reduction in PEF money in Dundee, which will result in a reduction of 18.8 full-time equivalent teachers in our schools. That money is meant to be for the most vulnerable young people. Are you disappointed with the way in which Scottish National Party colleagues in Dundee are running the situation?