The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
Yes, indeed.
It is your plan that put the project not in delivery or in development but in the future. You will recognise that the Kingsway campus has to be closed within two years, because of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete. That is the lifespan that it has been given. Do you think that this plan, in which you have placed the project in some amorphous future, will ensure that the money flows to allow us to build a new campus within two years?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
Cabinet secretary, I am not sure that you know what is in my mind as I am talking to you, so I will explain it to you. This part of the process—the upgrade to Gardyne campus—is partly funded by the UK Government and is contingent on a broader plan in order to deliver the whole plan. My question to you is this: at what point will we have clarity on whether that money will flow to allow the whole plan to proceed?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
That is excellent. Thank you, convener.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
Have you engaged with the Scottish Funding Council on the capacity and funding streams for that kind of work?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
I will move on to the budget process. We had the cabinet secretary in just before you—I do not know whether you caught any of that evidence or whether you were travelling. I raised with her the frustrations that were expressed in your evidence and report about transfers in budget, and she committed to having a conversation with the commission about agreeing a position on how those transfers are represented. Is that a welcome commitment? How would you take that forward?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
Thank you. We have had a fair amount of evidence from the Scottish Fiscal Commission and the other experts that Liz Smith referred to that the information is hazy at best.
Ahead of next year’s budget, would the Government agree a process with the Scottish Fiscal Commission?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
The SFC does not think that you will do that and has not used the pay policy in its forecasts. Are you concerned that the SFC does not believe what the Government is saying about its pay policy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
In June 2025, the minister, Mr McKee, set out a £1 billion target, which was increased to £1.5 billion in the budget. The target is based on assumptions that independent commentators have called “heroic”. For example, public sector head count increased by 6 per cent in the most recent quarter for which figures are available. Your track record suggests that you are not delivering on the process that you have in place, so why should the committee believe that you will be able to deliver on the process that is ahead of us?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
The Government has been saying a version of that for years—going back to the resource spending review that your predecessor commissioned. It has been talking about restraint in those areas. However, the latest published figures show a 6 per cent increase.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Michael Marra
On a point of detail, you say in the spending review, on finance and local government, that there is a target of £193.4 million for savings and efficiencies, of which £128 million sits under the heading of “Other Efficiencies and Reform”. That offers no level of detail for us to scrutinise whether that figure is serious or deliverable, does it?