The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I have also spoken to sources in the university in student recruitment, who said that they were sounding the alarm on the issue way before then, that the figures were entirely unrealistic and that management were told that but did not listen.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
I will refer to one specific instance. The audit and risk committee of the university met on 23 October, and a minute of that meeting was presented to court on 12 November. That minute says:
“At the balance sheet date, the University had access to a £40m Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) with the Bank of Scotland. This RCF has never been drawn since its initial agreement in 2016. The RCF has been renewed since the balance sheet date and is now in place until October 2026.”
Given the evidence that we have heard today, none of that was true at that point, was it? There was no access to a revolving credit facility. As Mr Fotheringham has already told us, that had not been renegotiated with the bank. Who would have prepared that minute?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
Could you name the deputy director of finance at that time?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 June 2025
Michael Marra
You did not know that those things were untrue at the point at which you signed it off?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
That is a fair point, but certainly not two ferries. The—
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
Thank you, both, for your very compelling and full evidence. Mr Sturrock, on the time-cost effectiveness balance, I want to draw you more on the cost, which various members have touched on and which is part of the basis of the committee’s inquiry. I think that the bill for public inquiries is now running at more than £230 million. As people who have participated in such inquiries, do you both recognise that the costs are out of control?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
Convener, I was remiss in not putting on the record my involvement, on behalf of constituents, in the Eljamel inquiry.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
My final question is about your submission, Mr Campbell, in which you wrote:
“Rapidity in delivering findings is important. Interim reports are often useful, in a long and complicated matter.”
Are interim reports underused?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
Do we not see enough of them, given the length of inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Michael Marra
You obviously have not seen the Parliamentary timetable for the next two weeks.