The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2056 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Okay. Surely, given this changing environment, with different leadership over different periods of time, we should not be losing sight of those recommendations. They came out in 2020, and the progress report, which came back in 2021, has been described to me as
“the worst report in Scottish public life”.
As the convener has pointed out, it showed local bodies in Dundee misleading the public about progress that had not been made. We had the oversight assurance group in 2021, which reported in 2023, and now we have the whole system change programme.
All of that leads me to ask this question: do we not need external leadership to actually deliver this? The current model of leadership is just not working, is it?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Is anybody reporting to the board on progress against those 51 recommendations in the report that was brought out? A lot of work went into that analysis. Are those things being reported on? I have to say that I cannot see any evidence that they are. They are being substituted by one programme after another, instead of someone saying, “This is the mission. We need to deliver it. How do we get there?” After all, we are now six years on.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
I want to stick with the issue of scope for a moment. Will the current scope of the whole system change programme meet the 51 recommendations of the Strang review?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Moving on to single site provision, I would note, as an example, the state of Strathmartine hospital, which the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland reported on in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2023 and 2024. The 2024 report on the hospital, which set out what I have described as “Dickensian conditions”, was published only half an hour before I had a meeting with the chair and the chief executive of the Mental Welfare Commission. It was months late; it would not have been published, had I not asked for a meeting. You talk about oversight and accountability—these are the reports that the leadership should have been responding to, but were not.
You have said that changes have been made to the physical environment. I agree with that—I have been to the site, and I have seen those changes—but what really concerns me is your comment that there is no clear plan and no costings for the move to single site provision. Do you think that that information has to be provided and put into the public domain by the board, for the sake of accountability?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Is your understanding of that live—in other words, as of today? I have to say that I have a very different understanding of the completion of the one-to-ones. Staff were told that the process was to be completed by August, but then at the end of June—four weeks before the process was meant to be completed—they were told that it would not be happening. I had been telling the health board for many months that there was no chance of it happening in August—that was absolutely clear.
There has been no publication of the capital costs or the investment in Murray royal hospital that is required; nothing about the overtime required to transfer staff from one place to another; nothing about meeting with bank staff; and nothing about the shortfall. Have you seen plans that actually contain that detail? Has the board examined the cost of making this move versus the need to deliver for patients?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
When was that?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
There have been such changes almost every year.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Was it the new chief executive, or was it one of the previous two in the past three years, who downgraded the scope of the programme? When did the downgrading happen?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
And not on the Strang recommendations.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Michael Marra
Is that the intention, though?