The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1825 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
There has been a real-terms cut.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
My contention is about how you are representing your support for increased defence spending while, at the same time, opposing it in a variety of ways on the basis that you claim that you are being short changed in public spending when, in fact, the money is not being attributed on the basis of personnel in Scotland and, overall, the defence budget has to rise faster than the rest of expenditure. I do not understand the Government's position—it cannot claim that both of those things are consistent at the same time.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
You are not including the 14,000 people who are employed in Scotland in that figure of £2.1 billion. That is about money that is attributed to industry, rather than the global figure on defence, isn’t it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
You will recognise that, at a Treasury level, the Government has to make decisions about where it spends the entirety of its budget.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
I agree with that. However, if you want there to be an above-average increase in defence spending, how can you make the argument that you want to have the same average increase for devolved capacity? Do you want defence spending to grow faster or not?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
Was it a zero-based budgeting approach? We have talked about that previously, and I believe that that is what the UK Government undertook.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
I want to close on an issue that is directly related to revenue spend. Since 2019, when the Government declared a public health emergency on drugs deaths, more than 6,000 people have died in Scotland. As has been announced today, that is still the highest rate in Europe. It is an appalling record. In the 2024 budget, you made a real-terms cut to alcohol and drug partnerships. Do you think that that decision will be reversed in the forthcoming budget? Is it a decision that you regret? Given that we are talking about a spending review and setting plans for the coming years, is there going to be anything in that spending review that will set out a plan to deal with this horrific national record?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
That is fair.
In your response to GERS, you claim that, in 2023-24, only £2.1 billion of defence spending was actually spent on industry in Scotland. Do you recognise that 75 per cent of defence spending goes on personnel, of whom there are more than 14,000 in Scotland, which is not included in the figure that you used?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
Events will change decisions at the time; I would not expect anything else. However, our concern is that we want to see a level of detail that we can understand on a policy level. Do you now have proposals from your cabinet secretaries in front of you? We are about three months out from the finalisation of the spending review. The UK spending review took 14 months to complete. I understand that you have a more truncated period and that there is a challenge in that, but are you now saying to cabinet secretaries, “No, I don’t agree with you—you have to do less of that; you have to do more of this”? Is that the stage that you are at? Do you have proposals in front of you?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Michael Marra
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I will start with the spending review. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has set out that there will be a gap of £2.64 billion by 2039-40 between projected income and your expenditure plans. Will the spending review close that gap?