The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 728 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I do not think that it will.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
My question is just on the back of what the minister said.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
I have two supplementaries, following on from Tess White’s questions.
Minister, the recent decisions by the UK Supreme Court in London and by the Court of Session in Edinburgh have made it clear that women and girls need to be protected. Single-sex spaces and services are vital for their protection, yet all too often the Scottish Government has put gender ideology above the rights of women and girls. Will the Scottish Government be implementing the EHRC’s interim update on the practical implications of the UK Supreme Court judgment?
Also, do you not think that, the longer that you wait, the more that you are not only putting women and girls at risk, but leaving public bodies liable in cases such as the Sandie Peggie case? You have updated us a little bit on that matter, but I am concerned about what happens while we wait. People are being affected every day. Women and girls are not protected at this moment, even though the judgment has been issued. Will you clarify what you are doing now, while you are waiting for certain things to come through?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you. Convener, I have one more question, which touches on budgeting. Can I ask that quickly?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
In the past, you have spoken to the committee about ensuring that, when we implement something, every department understands what the budget is for, whether that is for women and girls, for people in poverty or for disability, and that they make sure that it is aligned throughout every department. At that time, it was said that there were gaps for some issues. I want to ensure that we do not face the same situation when the EHRC guidance comes and that we make sure that it is implemented right through each department.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Minister, when you have been in the committee in the past, we have spoken about budgeting across all the departments and asked how we ensure that, throughout its work, each department adheres to women’s rights and other rights. Can you guarantee that every department will implement, for example, the EHRC guidance? As Cat McMeeken said, the policy might sit in different areas, such as education, or it might sit in your area. We have not yet got the budgeting right to implement a lot of this. What guarantees can you give that every department will implement the EHRC guidance and that everybody soaks it up in relation to single-sex spaces, places and services?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you—that would be really helpful.
Minister, to follow on from Tess White’s question on engagement, women’s rights groups, including For Women Scotland, feel neglected by the Scottish Government. That was especially true during the debate on the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, when the Scottish Government spent more time engaging with groups that supported the bill.
What is the Scottish Government doing to ensure that, going forward, all sides are heard equally? Will you, in your ministerial role, personally guarantee that women’s groups such as For Women Scotland, and groups such as Sex Matters and LGB Alliance, will be called for evidence?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
Thank you, Cat—if you could write to me on that, that would be great.
You mentioned that information will come forward from the Sullivan review and that there is a lot in it to unpack. Parts of that review are for the UK Government to act on, but there are also implications for the Scottish Government. Do you have a date for the information coming forward?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It was in relation to children’s gender markers.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Dr Pam Gosal MBE
It is very good to hear that you will move at pace because, as I said, this is about protection. It is also about rights, so there could be more court cases.
I wrote to you asking whether the Scottish Government will implement the recommendations of the Sullivan review on collecting data based on biological sex. Your response to my written question stated:
“The Scottish Government has previously committed to reviewing its guidance on collecting data on sex and gender by the end of 2026 as part of the Non-Binary Equality Action Plan.”—[Written Answers, 17 April 2025; S6W-36211]
When my colleague Tess White highlighted in the chamber last week that there is a “serious safeguarding risk” with regard to changing the gender marker of children in national health service records, she received a non-answer from the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice. As the Minister for Equalities, can you give me a clear answer as to whether the children’s gender markers should be changed in NHS records?