The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1895 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. First, for the benefit of the committee, I ask the witnesses to give a brief overview of how the current system of compensation recovery works. That would be a useful place to start. I will start with Alastair Ross, who is sitting in the middle, and then others can pitch in.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
That was a helpful overview. Does anyone want to add anything?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
Are witnesses content that the Social Security (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill enables the same system to be created for Social Security Scotland that exists for DWP benefits? I wonder whether you might want to comment on the synergies.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
Thank you. That was a comprehensive overview of that interaction, if you like, in the bill, and the views of insurers. Does anyone else want to contribute anything at this point?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
That is fair. I decided to go to the middle—I do not know why I did that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
Good morning. I will begin by looking at the theme of redeterminations. Social Security Scotland’s client survey suggested that most people who think that a decision has been wrong do not actually ask for it to be redetermined. Many of the reasons for that are focused around the idea that the redetermination will not be successful. What more could and should Social Security Scotland do to support clients to request redeterminations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
That practical example is helpful, thank you. I am sure that we will want to explore that in more detail. Richard Gass, would you like to add anything about your experience?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
That is an interesting point. There is a variance of views on whether people are more exposed in a rural area and whether there is more stigma. We would certainly want to consider that; it is a useful point.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 28 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
The minister rightly points to the impact of the Scottish child payment but, given last week’s poverty and inequality statistics and his Government’s budgetary decisions, which include slashing the housing and employability budgets, does he accept what the Institute for Public Policy Research, Save the Children and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation have said, which is that the interim poverty targets are at risk of being missed or are going to be missed? Does he agree with those experts?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 27 March 2024
Paul O'Kane
In a previous response, the cabinet secretary chose to selectively quote John McMunagle, the co-convener of the GMB union at the yard. He also said that David Tydeman had
“inherited an almost impossible job”
and that
“arguably out of the six or seven CEOs that we have had, David has been the best of them”.
When is the cabinet secretary going to meet GMB representatives, as well as the workers at the yard that they represent, to hear what they have to say and to listen carefully to their concerns? Will she respond to their ask for direct awards to be made in order to ensure that we keep the yard viable and supporting the economy of Inverclyde and Port Glasgow?