The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1011 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
I would like to ask about lifelong learning. What do you think the role of lifelong learning is in addressing child poverty? Is there an overlap with a just transition to net zero and training people for green jobs? Perhaps the witnesses in the room would like to respond first.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
Project 12 in the national strategy for economic transformation includes:
“developing a stronger, simplified lifelong learning system, including support targeted at those who need it most.”
To what extent do you expect that low-income parents will be the main focus?
I do not know whether Kenny Anderson wants to come in on that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
I will move on to my final question. To what extent are parents now the central focus of the growth in employability activity? Philip, that might be a suitable question for the IPPR.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
Do any of the online witnesses have anything to add?
If not, my final question is about how we ensure the availability of a diverse range of education. There have been several references to green jobs as well as to some of the caring professions that parents on low incomes look to. How do we ensure that a truly diverse range of opportunities—which the economy needs and which will lead to well-paid employment—are available to low-income parents?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
Keith Robson, do you want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
I suppose that what I am asking is whether services are expanding or whether resources are just shifting. Sarah, do you want to comment on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
Are there Scottish Government policies that make it easier to provide education and training to low-income parents? Are there policies that are barriers, that make it more difficult and that need to be addressed?
Would anybody who is online like to come in first?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
I will pick up a point that Marion Davis made. Does the increased focus on parents affect the scale of provision for other groups, such as young people and disabled people, or the way that they are treated?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 June 2023
Katy Clark
Keith Robson, do you want to come in?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Katy Clark
I am grateful for the opportunity to appear before the committee again.
I met both petitioners yesterday. Roseanna Clerkin is personally affected, as one of the individuals who has suffered from debilitating chronic pain and life-altering injury after undergoing a mesh procedure. Lauren McDougall’s mother, who has now passed away, was also affected, and I know that the committee has received testimonies from many other individuals who have been affected.
As the committee knows, the mesh used in hernia operations is different to transvaginal mesh, but many of the issues are similar, and they affect both men and women. However, there is a lack of data on the extent of the problem. That is why the petitioners are asking for an independent review; they want that data to be gathered, and the use of surgical mesh and fixation devices to be suspended until such a review has been concluded.
I have submitted freedom of information requests to every health board in Scotland, because I wanted to know the number of patients who were treated for hernias using surgical mesh and who had been readmitted to hospital following complications that arose from mesh. Most health boards did not provide information, but some did respond. NHS Ayrshire and Arran revealed that 8 per cent of all patients who were implanted with mesh to treat a hernia in its hospitals were subsequently readmitted due to complications arising from the mesh, while NHS Lanarkshire said that the figure was 10 per cent.
That data suggests that the petitioners are right to highlight the need for a review to explore the issue further, yet the Scottish Government continues to refuse to engage with them—indeed, the minister and the former minister refused to meet with the petitioners directly. Given that lack of engagement with the petitioners by Scottish ministers, I urge the committee to consider asking the Cabinet Secretary for NHS Recovery, Health and Social Care to appear before the committee and give evidence so that we can consider the issues further.