The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 934 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
I am trying to understand the figures that you have provided today and how they relate to information that we were provided with previously. You said that 3,075 individuals are on the victim notification scheme. Is that correct? Reference was also made to 25 per cent of victims being on the scheme. I appreciate that there are three schemes, and there was also reference to other figures. You can correct me, but that is the information that you have given today.
I am trying to understand the gap between the number of those who are registered on the system—I appreciate what has been said about trying to increase that number—and the number of those who are notified. According to the figures that we were given previously, 477 offenders were released during the early releases in the summer, but only five victims were notified. That seems to be the pattern. The number of victims who get information on release seems to be very low. I know that you listed all the different types of notification that can be given and the different organisations that are involved, but could you confirm that, at the moment, notification levels are low? Could you outline what they are, either today or in correspondence after the meeting, so that we can understand the nature of the problem that we are trying to address?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
It came from your colleague Lucy Smith.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
I hope that the convener does not mind me asking about this. Some of my amendments to the bill propose that it should be more of an opt-out scheme than an opt-in scheme, which some lobbying organisations have argued for. It would be interesting to understand whether you have looked at that and why you seem to have taken the view that you do not wish to go down that avenue. What difference do you consider that having an opt-out scheme would make to the uptake, compared to the proposals that you are making?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Katy Clark
How long is that pack? How many pages?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2024
Katy Clark
Can you point to any particular policy areas that have been challenging?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2024
Katy Clark
Good morning, cabinet secretary. In what ways has the act helped to ensure effective work to tackle child poverty across all policy areas within the Scottish Government? Have any particular policy areas been more challenging to include in the cross-government approach?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Katy Clark
Do you agree that the problem that parliamentarians have in this area is the lack of evidence? Due to the Contempt of Court Act 1981, we do not really have any jury research in Scotland—we do not know what the split in juries is. It might be that the changes to jury size and majority would make very little difference to conviction rates, or they could make a considerable difference in specific cases.
I do not necessarily expect you to know the answer to this question, but it would be really useful if you could provide any information. With regard to other jurisdictions, are you aware of any evidence on jury splits where there is a not guilty outcome? In cases in which a unanimous decision is required but the jury cannot reach that or a supermajority, there will be a split. It might be that the split is such that there is a majority in favour of conviction but that, because of the system, that does not lead to a conviction. I appreciate that this is not your day job and that you would not necessarily look at this, but have you been able to get information on jury splits when you have been considering the issue? I suspect that the information might not be available.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Katy Clark
That is the question, really—whether we should take the decision before we have more evidence.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Katy Clark
Yes. I was at that meeting.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Katy Clark
That suggests that the changes would not make a significant difference. However, we simply do not know because we do not, because of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, have evidence. Is that correct? We are being asked to proceed on the basis of a guess rather than on the basis of evidence.