The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1466 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Douglas White, I will turn to you. You spoke about a significant risk to the public if clinics operate outside the legislation that might come into force. That would be illegal. Why should even a single clinic operate outside the legislation? If it does, surely it should be sanctioned by the police.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Forgive me, but you said that a significant number of clinics could operate outside the legislation. It would be easy to trace if there were significant numbers.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
It feels a bit like the wild west in the industry compared with healthcare, where complications are very much looked at, and there is an entire mechanism and process.
Louise Caithness, in your submission, you spoke about how it is “nonsensical” to include skin peels and so on. What is the complication rate for skin peels?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
That is for superficial peels, and the rate goes up for medium and deep peels. The complications seem to end up with general practitioners, who have no idea about the chemicals that have been used. That is one of the concerns that I was asking Lynsey Wilson about.
I will leave it there, as other people want to come in.
10:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
I declare an interest as a practising NHS GP. Thank you very much for appearing today. Earlier, in private, the committee was asking exactly the same question about why the list of regulators is as it is in the bill. Victoria, given what you have just said, I will ask you to respond.
However, I am also very interested to speak a bit further about what consumers do not know. When people go to a doctor in a GP practice or in hospital, they know the standard of care that they are going to receive, but when they go to someone in the beauty industry, they do not. For example, botulinum toxin needs to be in the fridge and stored between 2°C and 8°C, and vaccines are the same. Medical practitioners have to prove that there is a medical-grade fridge and that substances are stored at that temperature, but that does not necessarily happen everywhere, does it?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
We heard from the previous panel about people performing procedures at home and in their garden pods, for example, and that such businesses would be put at risk. In my opinion, if someone is providing a procedure, they need to do that in a clean environment where there is the ability to wash their hands and have certain levels of hygiene. That is what a HIS premises would provide and it could still be made a comfortable, homely environment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
My final question is about what we heard from the first panel about there being no mechanism for recourse. Will the bill provide people with a mechanism for recourse if something were to happen? If not, what would you do?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Will the member take an intervention?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
Would there be a cost to the individual for creating an advance care directive?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 November 2025
Dr Sandesh Gulhane
On a technical point, the GMC holds separate lists for registered general practitioners, consultants and so on. Are you proposing that the GMC would create lists for people who are opting in to be the registered medical practitioners specifically, rather than making proposals in relation to care responsibilities or anything else? Are you talking about something that specific?