The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1936 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is helpful.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, and thank you all for the information that you have submitted in advance—it is really helpful. As you will be aware, people have raised concerns about the scope of the bill and the scale of the challenge. I want to start with a question that Professor Ó Giollagáin included in his paper: is the bill relevant to the primary issue that faces Gaelic speakers in Scotland?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you; that was very clear. We have had evidence that supports what you have said. Specifically, one submission states:
“The Bill as introduced is a cautious and incrementalist measure that should bring some modest improvements over time.”
Is that good enough?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one final question, if the convener can indulge me.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
We are the education committee and this is largely an education bill. Can you share any information about the direction that ministers gave you about the scope of and detail in the bill?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am just looking for you to share with us anything about the direction that was given when the bill was being developed.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one further question but I will keep it short.
The bòrd has said that it does not know whether the bill adequately recognises the challenges in the community and that that could erode trust and engagement. Are witnesses concerned about that and, if so, what do we need to do differently to keep communities’ trust and engagement?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 1 May 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
To make it clear, that was not a statement of the bòrd’s opinion on the bill; it said that it does not know whether the bill does enough to address that. That was the point.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Before I make my point, I clarify that the arguments that I made earlier related to amendments 51 and 52. I mixed up amendment 52 and amendment 55 but—I hope—not my arguments. I hope that that is clear.
Residents are particularly concerned that the bill’s current provisions allow a developer to have almost sole control over the single building assessment for a particular development. Which aspects of the bill can mitigate those concerns?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Amendment 55 is in a similar vein to my amendments in the previous group. The previous group was about a committee for all SBAs and having an independent reviewer. Amendment 55 specifically introduces a provision to make it mandatory for ministers to consult the occupiers and owners in a building before a single building assessment is undertaken on that building under the legislation. Again, that would add the owner/occupier voice to the process.
The amendment has been produced very much in response to a group of residents, of whom I know the minister is aware, who felt that their voice was not fully taken account of in the development of the single building assessment. In some cases, things such as a waking watch were put in place without much consideration for the residents and without giving them advance communication. Although it was necessary at the time, residents felt that that was particularly difficult and that they should have been a bit more involved. Amendment 55 seeks to guarantee that owners and occupiers will have a voice in the creation of single building assessments that are relevant to their building.