The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2264 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Can you share those details with us now?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
We do not have much time on the matter. Stakeholders and people with lived care experience would probably have thought that the Government would have done that in advance, given that the Government made a lot of the UNCRC. What specific drafting routes are you looking at to bring the provisions into scope?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Nobody wants to have to go to court to do that—I am not suggesting that—but, ultimately, there is no point having rights if you cannot uphold them. Therefore, is the answer to lodge amendments to the bill on participation, best interests and non-discrimination duties at stage 2?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I will quote from the note of the meeting with young people: talking about the bill, the group said that
“there needs to be someone, whether a person or a department, who needs to be culpable if it isn’t delivered.”
Who does the minister think that that is?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Young people told us—and the minister must acknowledge—that local authorities are really struggling to do anything in the margins that is not a statutory responsibility. Is that something that she thinks the bill will take—
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do not doubt that people have welcomed those provisions, but we have also heard significant evidence about what is not there. On that point, what is not there is the commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in some areas. Many stakeholders have said that the drafting of sections 1 and 2 specifically on aftercare and section 10 on the register of foster carers, for example, amend the Children’s (Scotland) Act 1995. As that is pre-devolution UK legislation, it is outwith the scope of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act 2024. What is the minister’s view on whether the bill needs to be amended to bring the affected sections within scope of the 2024 act?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I guess that that will happen as we progress to stage 2.
I have another question. What training and qualifications would you expect the single member on the panel to have?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me—I thought that you had reached the end of discussing my amendments.
I am not sure that I fully follow the argument about access to social care not having been offered, or, indeed, the previous argument about palliative care. I do not understand why the requirement would create an additional barrier, unless the member admits that social care and palliative care are in such a poor state in Scotland that the timescales involved would be difficult and the money involved prohibitive.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Will the member take an intervention?