The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1905 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I was going to say good morning, but it is the afternoon.
Thank you for your honesty, but also for the depth in which you have engaged with this because it is important. Before I ask my main question, if it is all right, I want to come back to Stephanie Lowe’s earlier point about the statistic that I quoted last week. That is what I think should drive us, and I think that your industry and our intentions to improve the life chances of young people across Scotland are aligned on that. What would you do, specifically, to make it easier for your industry to deliver for those 84,000 young people?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is coming across strongly.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
You have said that there should be a seat on the board. Should there also be committee structures for particular sectors?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Thank you, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there a regional or structural model that you think could be developed that would support the people you represent, colleges in the sector as well, to the ends of getting young people into jobs?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sai, you said that you have observer status on the SFC. How should that proceed going forward?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there a supply problem? Is there a lack of students from colleges who are, for example, prepared to take on the responsibility because they are busy doing other things, or is it a structural question of recruitment?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am grateful to the cabinet secretary for taking my earlier intervention.
My amendment 317 would require the chief inspector to collaborate with Education Scotland in the exercise of their functions, which could help build a more coherent and collaborative education and learning system, as was called for by a range of stakeholders in the consultation on the bill. I take the cabinet secretary’s point about specificity and whether there is something on which to hang the duty, so, given the concerns about the specific mention of Education Scotland, I will not move amendment 317.
However, I still think that there needs to be coherence in the system and that the current lack of coherence should be addressed. That is why I think that my amendment 318 is really important, as it would require the chief inspector to work with relevant establishments and local authorities to
“support children, young people and their parents in those establishments”
with regard to inspections. We have already debated the purpose of inspections, and given that my position on that is on the record, I will not restate it, in the interests of time.
Amendment 318 is an important amendment. It would add to what the cabinet secretary is trying to do by suggesting that there should be collaboration, instead of simply indicating that the chief inspector must have regard to it.
I am not sure that I take the point about this statutory responsibility falling within the responsibility of local authorities. I agree that that is a statutory fact, but I am not sure that it precludes the chief inspector from working with local authorities and other bodies collaboratively to seek improvement. I am unconvinced that amendment 318 should not be tested in committee.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the intention behind amendment 318, the cabinet secretary will say that this is the responsibility of local authorities or schools, and it is not something that the cabinet secretary or the Scottish Government can do something about. Indeed, everyone around the table today has heard that quite a bit. The amendment therefore attempts to provide some sort of oversight so that somebody is at least looking at those establishments and asking them to work together for the improvement of education across Scotland.