The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2264 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
The colleges might have concerns about planning for the transition and then being able to engage in some of the collaborative activity that the minister might have seen on his visit yesterday or discussed with them, because some of that might have a cost attached to it. I want to identify that each college might need to consider that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I agree.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
What is the role of colleges, then?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I do not think that SDS denied that there are concerns about the issues that you outlined. In fact, SDS and others said that those issues—the inflexibility that exists and the fact that apprenticeships go back into the system, as well as colleges being in a perilous situation as a result of decisions that have been taken in other parts of the portfolio that the minister holds—were all concerns for apprenticeships. The Federation of Small Businesses said that it was becoming much more difficult for its members to be able to afford to take on apprentices.
Those are the problems. The bill does not seem to address any of those things. In fact—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In the following years, can colleges in Glasgow expect to have the additional funding reflected in their allocations?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
If it is all right, convener, I will put my questions on SAAB to Paul Campbell and then move on to my questions about equalities. Does that work?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you for throwing me that line, Mr Davenport—that was helpful. Another explanation is that I might have paraphrased part of your submission. I was interested in unpicking the part of it where you say:
“Integration has been key to that success, and breaking up SDS is a threat to it.”
You alluded to that earlier. You go on to say:
“If the goal is greater efficiency, it must be understood that breaking off part of SDS, while potentially streamlining one element of funding, will introduce far greater inefficiencies elsewhere.”
That is the part of your submission, which I described as the existence of a vacuum, that I wanted to unpick.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is a good point that the committee will reflect on. It could be helpful for us to look at some of the suggestions that come out of that inquiry to see whether we need to do anything with the bill.
Nicola Jackson, do you have a view?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there any reason why the bill could not replicate SAAB in the structure that it will put in? It does not do that now, but is there any reason why it could not do that?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that.
I want to talk a little bit about the equalities aspects. Paul, you just mentioned the SAAB equalities sub-group, and I will return to that. I will start, however, with a question for Carolyn. Thank you for your evidence, which is very important. What I have heard is that the current system is not serving women well. Should there be duties in the bill to mandate, for example, data on participation and achievement disaggregated by gender and background?
12:45