The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2379 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I note that no children’s rights and wellbeing impact assessment was done on SSI 2021/420. I am keen to hear the reason for that. Perhaps the Government will address that at a future date.
In addition, given that the minimum age of criminal responsibility that will come into force this month is 12, it is interesting that the United Nations has said that 14 should be the minimum. I am keen to know why the Government has chosen a lower age.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My question is for Susie Fitton and for Satwat Rehman. How might the increase in unpaid work impact on Government plans for the no one left behind approach to employment, and on the aim of reducing by half the employment gap for disabled people?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I thank the witnesses for joining us, and for the written evidence that they submitted in advance, which was incredibly helpful.
I have a couple of questions, initially for Susie Fitton and Catriona Melville. I am keen to understand a bit about the impact on disabled people of having to rely more on, as well as having to give, unpaid care. What is your assessment of last week’s budget? Does it go far enough to support unpaid carers and social care, given the additional pressures that are still present as a result of the pandemic?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I could have listened to you all day. Catriona, do you have any comments on the impact of unpaid care not only on the older people who rely on it but on those who provide it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am pleased to hear that the things that were put in place were positive and I hope that they will continue, because it shows that we can do things differently and be very fleet of foot when we need to be. It is encouraging to hear that.
The question that I have is specifically on the resilience fund, the local authorities that were initially able to access it and the additional 10 local authorities that were able to access it subsequently. Kaja Czuchnicka, are you aware of how they were chosen? Did the funding go to the areas where it was needed the most? When the additional 10 local authorities were added, did that come with additional funding or was it a case of spreading the initial funding slightly differently?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry. I mean the communities recovery fund.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Does anyone else on the panel want to comment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you for joining us and for providing your submissions in advance—the submissions are incredibly helpful. I also put on record my thanks to the third sector for everything that those involved in it have done—this year in particular, but also beforehand. Having spent a number of years of my working life in the third sector, I know how hard those in it work and how important it is.
It is clear to me from some of the evidence that we have received that the impact of the past year on not just the services that you deliver but jobs in the sector, including those that you are able to create, has been significant. You note that some organisations have been struggling and have had to make some painful operating decisions. Could you tell us a little bit about that and about redundancies and how many jobs you think could have been affected by the pandemic over the past year and a half?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
My questions are for Myles Fitt and Ian Bruce. You will be aware that a number of citizens advice bureaux in Glasgow faced funding difficulties in the past year or so. Can you tell us about the impact of that and about the importance of resourcing such organisations? Given the UK Government’s changing approach to a three-year funding settlement, do you have any indication from local or central Government in Scotland that they will seek to transfer that approach to your organisations, notwithstanding the fact that three years is good but more would be better?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 December 2021
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I direct my question to Paul Bradley from the SCVO first.