The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2062 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I can see that there will be such circumstances, but I just cannot work out what they might be or why a tribunal would be privy to a piece of information that an individual would not yet know. I get that it could cause the person harm but, in the circumstances of the particular tribunal, I am not sure that I can imagine a reason or rationale for withholding that information.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 16 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have just one question. Are you in a position to set out what the rationale and grounds would be for withholding information from someone, and what the test would be for that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you; that is no problem at all. It seems to be the case with a lot of the discussion on this issue. Karon, do you have anything further to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I am sorry, Naomi. Does Sharon Cowan have anything to add on the particular point?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes—it is probably for all three of you, but feel free to go first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to reflect briefly on Naomi Cunningham’s point about women wondering whether there is a toilet that they can access safely. Let me say that, as a disabled woman, I experience that, and it is horrible to worry about whether you will be able to access a toilet. We need to get this right. I imagine that trans women and trans men, too, go through a similar experience when they leave the house, in that they wonder whether they will be able to access a toilet or changing room. Do you agree that part of the solution will be to have inclusive and private spaces?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is helpful.
We heard in previous evidence that, in Denmark, there was a move from self-ID for accessing a gender recognition certificate to self-ID for accessing medicalised processes such as gender identity treatment. Could you imagine that happening here, and has it been considered?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
That is also helpful.
My final question probably goes over ground that you have already gone over, but I want to be absolutely clear about this. What impact do you believe getting a gender recognition certificate would have on a person’s ability to receive medical treatment?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I want to press you on that point. Do you think that people who access a gender recognition certificate do that for the main purpose of accessing single-sex spaces? If that is the case, what you have said may be the case—I am not sure whether the international evidence bears that out, but I can see how it would be the case. However, a number of trans people have said that a gender recognition certificate is not about access to single-sex spaces, and some have even said that they recognise that that could be difficult in some circumstances. In fact, it is about being recognised in the gender that they live in when they go for a job or go to university, or when they die. Do you have evidence to suggest that people are accessing gender recognition certificates for those other purposes?