The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1926 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have one further question, but I will save it and write to the commission.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have two other brief questions. Could the Scottish Government have created a lower rate of ADP to transfer people on to, in order to mirror the DLA case load?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, Richard. Thank you for the evidence that you have provided so far and the information that you gave us in advance.
I am interested in the point about minimal income and bankruptcy and how much that leaves people with. In particular, I know that the fee to access the bankruptcy options has been lowered, but it is still leaving some people unprotected. Will you say a little about the purpose of the fee and whether it is becoming a barrier?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
In looking at this process, as you have set out in your evidence, there is a bit of policy divergence in that, with ADP, there is the interaction between the 50m rule and the 20m rule. Could any of the solutions that you have set out to address the transfer of individuals on DLA to ADP have been applied to the broader case transfer? It seems that, by definition, there will be two different systems, which will create inequity, in that some people will remain on a system that looks at the 50m rule as opposed to the 20m rule. If we are creating a solution to deal with this particular case load of people, could we not have done the same and extended that approach to others by addressing policies such as the 50m rule and the 20m rule?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Approximately how much do you collect in fees? You said that the majority of people do not pay, but it would be interesting to know what that figure is. I then have a further question that is still related to bankruptcy but slightly different, so I will pause.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I was looking forward to that answer as well.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—and welcome back.
My question was about people’s ability to borrow after they have been through the bankruptcy process, particularly for things like mobile phones or broadband—which I guess is not so much about being able to borrow as about being able to get credit. I think that you said that that issue did not specifically relate only to bankruptcy, and then you mentioned credit reference agencies. That is as much as I got.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you collect figures as to how much money you get from the total fees paid to you?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 26 May 2022
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Forgive me if my next question is slightly outwith your remit. As you say, when people become bankrupt, it is a fresh start and I can understand why it is a helpful option, but it can often result in people being unable to get further borrowing. I am not suggesting that people should then get into a cycle of borrowing, but even things such as getting a mobile phone or broadband contract can be difficult, and those are pretty essential. We have heard about that issue from a lot of witnesses. Do you have any views on what we could do about that or how we could improve that situation for people?