The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2021 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Where would the administrative burden of proof fall?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
A couple of questions have come up from the answers that we have been given. John Maton made a point about discretionary versus automatic disqualification. Will you explain that a bit and say what we would need to do here to apply discretionary disqualification instead of automatic disqualification?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
We heard some evidence about that from the sector last week. I think that those who gave that evidence would concur with that.
Does Keith Macpherson have anything to add?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do you think that a further review is needed? If so, what should it include? I see that John Picton is nodding. We will note that.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I think that there will be further questions from my colleagues on that particular point.
To stick with the theme of the review and what is in the bill, I think that John Picton said in his written submission that, in order to bring the bill in line with UK regulation, there would need to be a bit more on that. Does he feel that that came out in the consultation? Given his comment about bringing the bill into line with other parts of the UK, are there areas that should be part of the proposal or part of a broader review?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is much appreciated.
Gavin McEwan, this is my final question on the theme. Your written submission says that the law could go further. Notwithstanding your comment about reorganisation, which we have noted, have any other issues come out through the consultation that should be part of what is now proposed, as opposed to being part of a review in the future?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, panel, and thank you for engaging with the committee on the bill so far. I have a couple of questions about the consultation that led to the review of the proposals that are before us. I will start with Martin Tyson, if that is all right.
What is your view of the consultation to date? I refer to the one that was done in 2019 and then repeated. Are there any areas of regulation that have not been covered as part of the review and the bill?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there anything in particular that you can share with the committee about your experience as a regulator and about charities’ experience in England and Wales of changes such as automatic disqualification? I know that members will come to questions on that issue later, but is there anything that we could learn from the process and how you supported charities to meet new obligations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 9 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I have a final question on that point for Martin Tyson. Volunteer Scotland has said:
“we will not know the true impact of this legislation on charities, and their trustees, until it is clear how OSCR intend to communicate and implement the new measures. This is not clarified within the detail of the Bill.”
The SCVO said that the administration and comms budget could be significant, and we heard from John Maton about reprioritisation in his organisation. How is OSCR preparing for the legislation? What are your plans to communicate with the third sector on that? Will you be able to do it within existing budgets?