The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1926 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—I appreciate that. That is an interesting way to put it: what do we do first? We will need to have a wee think about that and probably come back to you guys for your expertise on it.
I want to pick up on your point, Luis, about measurement and data. Is the availability of data and the gathering of evidence and data, as well as your ability to compel that data to be provided, an issue? Are both things an issue, or is it just—
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Both. Okay. That links into my next question. How can we measure whether we are meeting those obligations? Also, how can we measure whether the state has used all its resources? How can we measure whether we have maximised the resources in terms of the relative provision? Where do we start?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
When you say “independently”, do you mean that families have to source that training, as opposed to its being readily available?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Zainab, do you have anything further to add?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Yes.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you—that is really helpful. There is a lot to do.
Did you want to add something to that, Rob?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Is there usually a time limit on an impossibility test? Your example reminds me of what happened during Covid, when libraries and other public centres were closed in order to house vaccination centres. Is there therefore a timescale attached?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sorry, Zainab, I missed the last bit of that. I think that you said that you would like MSPs to speak at events throughout the year.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. That is really helpful. We will have a think about how we can do that.
Convener, may I go on to my question about English for speakers of other languages?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning. Thank you for your opening statements and for answering the questions so far; it has been really helpful. I want to look more specifically at what we have just discussed. The evidence that we have had said—Dr Hosie, I think that you mentioned this when you last gave evidence—that our levels of, for example, food poverty and food bank use suggest that we are not really delivering a minimum core. Where are we, by international standards? If we have a global minimum core, but there is also the concept of a relative minimum core, where are we on that? Where should we as a committee be looking at when starting to consider a minimum core?