The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1936 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you. I have a supplementary question, but I will come back to that. Sarah Latto, do you wish to add anything?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the point about an independent review, you mentioned earlier that the proposals before us are based on OSCR’s perceptions. Are the proposals skewed in that direction?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Sarah Latto, I think that you said that there are aspects missing from the bill.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, and thanks for the evidence that you submitted in advance and for answering our questions today. My question is similar to what witnesses who were in the room earlier would have heard me ask. I am keen to understand a bit about the consultation process that led to the bill that is in front of us and how you would characterise your involvement in that. I will start with Rami Okasha, if that is okay.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Good morning, panel. Thank you for the evidence that you have given us in advance and for coming here this morning.
I want to explore a little bit the question of how we have got to this point and the review that, as has been indicated, has been part of the bill’s development. The Scottish Government has said that, although it is bringing forward this piece of legislation now, it will carry out a broader review in the future. Have you been involved in the development of the proposals in the current legislation? How would you characterise that involvement?
That question is for Jason Henderson, first of all.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that. Thank you. Is there anyone online who wants to come in?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
Do any of the other witnesses want to come in on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
I appreciate that; that makes sense.
I will now go to Shona NicIllinein.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 2 March 2023
Pam Duncan-Glancy
On the previous point, is there a mechanism somewhere in the middle that could be used so that, when people were disqualified, the world and their granny could not find the record of it but the burden on charities when they had to find such information would be reduced? Could there be a register that charities could contact OSCR about that, ultimately, could tell them whether a person appeared on it?
My second point relates to disqualification. I, too, was concerned about that, particularly given the impact that some charities can have on people who want to rebuild their life, part of which can be becoming a trustee. What would a compromise, waivered position look like? We probably accept that there need to be checks and balances in those areas. What would an easy waiver look like?