The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1316 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
There are points about the proportionality of the regulations, the idea of the level playing field and the need to have a pathway for reaching compliance.
What support would be helpful in enabling people to reach compliance? It was mentioned earlier that prescribing was a practical challenge, but practitioners work in collaboration with prescribers, so maybe that is one example of where things could be more tailored or more nuanced.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Is your key issue the need to have a level playing field?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Could mitigations be designed, such as support for training, so that individuals could develop their skills to meet the regulatory requirements that are to be introduced? There is also the issue around facilities and logistics, which we have discussed. Could there be access to common clinical space and a common user facility? How might that be developed? What is your view on how that could happen? It might be a nice idea, but would you create—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
You mentioned in your initial response to my question that it is not appropriate to carry out certain treatments in, say, a home setting. Could you give me some examples of what you are talking about?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. I think that Tina McCaffery also wanted to comment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Okay. On the point about prescribing, what would an ideal structure look like for you?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
I would like to ask a bit more about the impact that the bill will have on small, independent or home-based businesses, and how regulation could be designed in a way that improves safety while not creating barriers that would drive people to use unregulated providers.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Will you go into a bit more detail about where that split should be and what the treatment hierarchy is for a certain setting?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Paul Sweeney
My amendments 268 and 278 aim to strengthen the practical framework for administering assisted dying safely and responsibly. The amendments would require the Scottish ministers to publish detailed guidance on what to do if complications were to arise, including on what constitutes a “reasonable period” before death and how to respond to side effects or even failed medication. Without such guidance, clinicians could face serious medical legal risk if problems were to arise during the final stages of the assisted dying process. I believe that, together, the amendments are a reasonable measure to ensure safety and consistency during the most sensitive stage of the assisted dying process.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Paul Sweeney
My amendments 245 and 275 aim to strengthen the practical framework for the administration of assisted dying safely and responsibly. They would require the Scottish ministers to provide proper training for doctors and to publish detailed guidance on what to do if complications arose, including what constitutes a “reasonable period” before death and how to respond to side effects or even failed medication, however rarely such issues might occur.
Without those provisions, clinicians could face serious medical legal risk if problems arose during the final stages of the assisted dying process. The amendments would also create a duty to report any such problems to Public Health Scotland, ensuring that issues of safety were captured and analysed to inform on-going review and improvement of the assisted dying service.
Together, I believe that those measures ensure safety and consistency during the most sensitive stage of the assisted dying process. I am also aware that the member in charge of the bill will be seeking engagement with UK Government ministers on safeguards. Such safeguards will certainly be being sought by ministers at UK Government level.