Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1316 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Crisis in Ukraine

Meeting date: 24 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

Mr Sirel mentioned the Ukraine advice Scotland service that has been set up, which is great. However, he said that it is a passive system—an email inbox that is monitored and a telephone helpline—and that there were issues with access to data for locating people in Scotland who are have seasonal worker visas. The Scottish Refugee Council tried to access that information, not through the Home Office, which was being quite unco-operative, but through the four employment agencies that tend to deploy seasonal workers around Scotland.

Mr Ruskell asked about the farming community. Is there a way to advertise that advice line and promote it on social media through the farming community in Scotland? Could we ask people who have Ukrainian workers on their farms to introduce them to that advice service so that they can get extra access to support? That could be a mechanism to drive greater uptake of that service.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

I am curious as to whether it is in the gift of the Government to change the electoral system. Surely that is a parliamentary decision. Is it not for the Parliamentary Bureau to consider a review of the Parliament’s electoral system rather than the Government?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

Okay. I am happy to rest on that.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

An interesting theme arose in discussion with the petitioners at the previous meeting when we discussed potential comparators for the kind of protection that they would like for ancient woodland. The listed buildings programme and scheduled ancient monuments arose as a basis for considering how a new scheme of protection could be introduced instead of protection simply being from an SSSI, which might require a significant burden of evidence about particular horticulturally, scientifically or biologically significant characteristics. In effect, the forestry could simply merit protection on the basis that its amenity is important to the community or that it is known as an ancient woodland of native species rather than any other requirements.

Is there an opportunity to consider something akin to the scheduled ancient monuments programme or listed buildings programme under which communities could nominate for consideration areas of woodland that they want to be protected? When the listing system and protections for built heritage were introduced in the 1960s, it required a national survey, which was done by the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland, to identify the national list of protected sites. Perhaps a similar survey could be undertaken for woodlands, given the national scale the pressure that is faced. Perhaps that could be an interesting benchmark to consider.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

I am sympathetic to the petitioner’s request, as I think that the additional member system is rubbish—but there we go.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you very much.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

That is very helpful. You are calling for mandatory reporting. You described the way that you were treated, which was appalling. It was almost gaslighting. Will you describe what you think mandatory reporting should look like? How would it play out? What would it be like in your ideal scenario?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

I have been quite taken aback by the testimony today, as I think that we all have. It is obviously disappointing to hear the Government’s position on this. On the suggestion that the Scottish Government might consider addressing future recommendations made by the inquiry to improve legislation, policy and practice, do you think that will be sufficient to address any of the concerns that have been raised in your petition, or do you feel that that would not come close to dealing with the issue? Is there at least some element of what the Government is saying that might be helpful, or do you think that it is not adequate at all?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

No—but I could elaborate.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

I suggest that we also write to each of the local authorities to get an assessment of what their current provision is. It might be helpful to get an understanding of how each local authority manages the provision of sex education in their schools. Some schools will have teachers who are specially trained, while in some areas, there might be a team that goes round different schools. It would be interesting to find out what each local authority is doing, and that might help to inform the petitioner.