The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 756 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Your other option would have been to split Inverness in half, but I think that you would have got a few more objections to that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Should inconvenience be considered for regions? As much as I love my region, it covers more than half of Scotland’s landmass. It is quite difficult, on a practical level, to represent that large an area. You mentioned transport links—to get to parts of my region from Inverness, I have to go to Glasgow.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Minister, you said that a constituency member who was recalled would have to be allowed to stand in the subsequent by-election. Why is that? If they were not allowed to do that, it would create parity with regional members.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
When a complaint or some other trigger encourages officers to say, “Right. It’s maybe time to look at enforcement here,” do local authorities have enough tools at their disposal to force conditions to be complied with?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I think that I have covered everything that we needed to say, so I am happy simply to press the amendment.
Amendment 230 agreed to.
Section 56, as amended, agreed to.
Section 57 agreed to.
Long title agreed to.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Esme Clelland, I want to ask you about concerns that have been raised regarding an overreliance on planning conditions to deliver biodiversity goals. You have argued that conditions are often not complied with and that enforcement seems to be relatively rare. Planning Democracy has also agreed with that point in evidence to the committee. Are conditions often flouted?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to pick up on the responses from Kevin Murphy and Hazel Johnson on 20-minute neighbourhoods. If we think about how they can be applied in rural areas, surely the policy is not just to build homes within a 20-minute radius of where things already exist; it is a matter of getting people thinking about what services and facilities are not in an area and about how to use planning to change that. Do we need to encourage local authorities to think differently? When there is a good place for housing in a rural area where there is a need for housing and people waiting for housing, instead of thinking, “There’s nothing within 20 minutes, so we can’t build,” should local authorities consider how to ensure that there are work opportunities and leisure facilities within 20 minutes?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Do you have any reflections on that, Hazel?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
You used the word “monitoring” a few times, which takes me to my next question. Is a lot of enforcement not happening because there is no automatic scrutiny point at which officers and local councillors can ask whether something has been carried out and whether the conditions on which they agreed the application have come to fruition?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Thank you. Does anyone else have comments or reflections on how to increase compliance or whether there is a need for a clearer point of action for checking whether conditions are being met?