The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 908 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Does it have enough teeth?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to ask for the witnesses’ views on the overall consultation process, particularly on whether it met the requirement to be inclusive of children and young people.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I was just about to ask you the question that you have just asked yourself. I am glad that you have enjoyed the evidence sessions so far—I have, too. As we have already heard, there are many concerns about the regional list element in particular, and there is a lot of conflicting evidence on what is the best way forward. I am sure that, initially, you had to weigh up those concerns. How did you come to the process for removal that is laid out in the bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
You keep talking about fairness and parity between the two types of member. I go back to the answer that you gave to Sue Webber—there is something interesting about the idea that we are trying to force a first-past-the-post system on to the regional list. Did you think about doing it the other way and retaining the proportionality that came through in the election? What about replacing a recalled constituency MSP with somebody on their party list?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
If you want to measure the strength of feeling and test what constituents want, surely we need a yes or no process. It could be that 20 per cent of constituents sign the recall petition but 40 per cent of constituents are against it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I think that people will conflate the two because, whichever way you go about it, comparisons will be made. One suggestion that was made to the committee was that a full regional by-election be held. It was pointed out to us that if somebody is upset with the conduct of an individual MSP, they might also want to hold the relevant party to account—although that is not the primary objective of your bill, of course. Although people have that opportunity in a constituency by-election, they do not have it on the regional side, where the party directly replaces the individual concerned. Do you have concerns about that disparity?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Can you see that there is a difference? The parliamentary calendar works for those who want to attend or observe Christian holidays, but it does not work in the same way for other religions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
Okay.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to go back to the processes that are in place at the moment. In the course of the committee’s evidence sessions, many suggestions have been made about how to handle the situation. There is the idea of a regional by-election, which we have discussed. Other witnesses have said that if recall triggers are met by a regional MSP, they should automatically be disqualified and replaced by the next person on the list. What are your thoughts on those proposals? Are you likely to consider changes to that process for stage 2?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Emma Roddick
In the bill, there is currently a two-step process for regional members in which people would first have to sign a recall petition and then there would be a yes or no ballot on whether to remove the member. A suggestion has been made to put those steps together into a one-step process, which would mean that electors would have the opportunity to say yes or no from the beginning. There have been suggestions that that might improve secrecy around the recall petition. If you go to sign a recall petition, everybody knows that you are going to try to remove that MSP. There is no option to turn up and support them. What are your thoughts on that proposal?