The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 908 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
My questions have been answered, convener.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
For my part, when I was a councillor and MSP at the same time, it was not easy to hold both roles—I would compare it to being a minister at the same time as being an MSP—but a driver for me was not wanting to leave a vacancy on the local planning committee.
I am curious, though, minister. You say that the by-election concern is the main driver for the 372 days, but if a councillor were to step down within six months of the full election, there would not have to be a by-election. So, why is it 372 days instead of 186 days?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
It does, in a sense, because I did not want to put my ward in the position of having such a vacancy. All that I would say is that it feels inconsistent.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
Until May 2022, I held a role as a Highland councillor and received a salary for that, which I donated to local charities in the Highlands.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 October 2025
Emma Roddick
Given that there are 49 days for MPs to resolve their conflict, I still wonder why there is not a similar arrangement for councillors. If we believe that holding two roles is not the best situation and that we want to avoid by-elections, why not require that a councillor give up their role within 186 days?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Are you confident that, in that kind of set-up, you would be able to enforce, where necessary, if there were complaints about how a community-led partnership was operating?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Let me turn to powers. Stakeholders have raised concerns that restricting ownership of owner-occupied crofts to individuals could block community-led or partnership models. What is the commission’s view on such a change?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
This issue was touched on a little bit earlier. At present, crofting has two registers—the register of crofts and the crofting register. Will maintaining both be necessary, or should the longer-term aim be to move to a single, unified system?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Presumably, that will be helpful in dealing with disputes and making sure that boundaries are where everybody thinks they are.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Emma Roddick
I would like to go back to our discussion about enforcement. We have heard evidence that there is more focus on residency than on what is happening on crofts. What are your thoughts on the current duties? Are they where they need to be? I have had representations from people on Eigg, who say that the 32km residency limit includes part of the mainland—whether that points to residency might be in question.