The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6423 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
I want to get a sense of how the Government will monitor or is monitoring whether the funding profile is affecting farm viability or the uptake of new schemes. How are you tracking the change in the budget?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
You said that you have not announced the fund, but what is the timeline for that announcement and what are the delivery mechanisms going to be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
To follow on from that, line 177 in the level 4 budget workbook for the rural portfolio, for “Natural Resources”, shows a very steep reduction—it looks like a cut of close to 75 per cent—in the capital allocation in comparison with last year. The explanation in the column headed “Explanation of significant changes from previous year” says:
“It has not been possible to allocate capital funding from the Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands portfolio in 2026-27. The previously funded Atlantic rainforest restoration will now be in-scope of the Nature Restoration Fund, funded through”
the climate action and energy portfolio.
In speaking to stakeholders, I found that they were puzzled to learn that the fund even existed. I am concerned that there was a fund that could have been allocated while stakeholders were doing crucial work such as deer management and rhododendron bashing—I cannot think of a better term than that; perhaps eradication—and the work was getting done, but the fund has now been changed and cut. Applying to a nature restoration fund is a whole different thing; it does not really fit the needs of those projects. Apparently, there are currently 11 projects in the rainforest space that could really do with the kind of funding that seems to have been disappeared.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay—it is good to get clarity that that funding was for the FLS forestry estate. I back up your point about what happens if we have been doing that work and then it becomes harder to keep doing it. I am aware that we have been at this for years, and we have stopped and started.
There is perhaps a new realisation that we have a rainforest that is going to help us to meet some of our climate targets. In the past, we were looking simply at rhododendron eradication or bringing deer numbers down. We now understand the context in which we are working, and the aim is to defragment those precious parts of rainforests. I wonder, therefore, whether we need to be looking at that budget. You say that you are trying to find the money from somewhere else to keep that work going on, and that you recognise that it is important. Do you feel confident that you can find that money?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful.
With regard to the funding for the community development officers, a few years ago they were coming to me with concerns about where they were going to get the money. I know that we cannot necessarily put in place multiyear funding for them, but have we been able to get to a place where we can give them advance notice that funding is coming, rather than having them worrying about whether they will have a job and whether they can pay their mortgage or whatever?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay.
I want to ask another question, just out of curiosity. Line 117 of the level 4 workbooks relates to rural cohesion. There has been a cut to that budget, and the accompanying text says:
“The Rural Cohesion Budget funds projects and programmes which build knowledge of”—
the print is very small—
“and test approaches to rural development, addressing inequalities for people in rural communities.”
I would be interested to understand what some of those projects are. I wonder whether, if you do not have that information to hand, you could write to the committee to flesh that out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
There are concerns that discounting could undermine the deterrence and create a perception that breaches can be resolved quickly and quietly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
I get the point that you are trying to provide a deterrent, but I have a couple more questions. On the discretion to extend the payment period, what criteria will govern extensions? How will consistency be ensured?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Thanks for clarifying that.
In relation to transparency and oversight, is the Scottish Government willing to commit to annual publication of the headline data that it will be gathering, including the number of notices issued and whether they are paid, withdrawn or appealed? That would provide clarity on whether, as you said, we were not reaching the point of having to issue notices.