The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5861 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
We previously agreed to take the next items in private.
11:24 Meeting continued in private until 12:06.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Great.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is very welcome. After this evidence session, we will discuss how we will communicate our findings so far.
Fulton MacGregor has the next questions.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
The next item on our agenda is to take evidence as part of our inquiry into the council tax system in Scotland. We have around 75 minutes for this discussion. We are joined by Shona Robison, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government, and her officials. Ellen Leaver is the acting director for local government, and David Storrie is the head of local taxation policy, at the Scottish Government. We are also joined by Councillor Katie Hagmann, who is the resources spokesperson at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities, and Mirren Kelly, who is the chief officer of local government finance at COSLA.
If we cast our memories back to the 2015 commission on local tax reform, it was a major piece of work involving consultation, research and cross-party engagement. I am interested in understanding from the witnesses—starting with the cabinet secretary—why they think that the commission ultimately failed to lead to any significant changes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much for that. Certainly, the point about political will came up quite strongly in our previous sessions on the issue.
I will direct my second question to Katie Hagmann. In its letter to the committee, COSLA states its intention to work with council leaders to develop cross-party support for reform. Given the political make-up of Scotland’s councils and the wide range of views, I am interested in understanding how you intend to approach that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 4 March 2025
Ariane Burgess
It is helpful to know that that is part of the process. I have a question for Councillor Hagmann and the cabinet secretary. Out of curiosity, why do you think that other taxation and public finance changes—for example, income tax changes—seem to take place without political consensus? What is the difference when it comes to council tax? Why do we need to take everybody with us on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Thanks, convener. I appreciate that.
We talked earlier about addressing the individual problem while not tackling the need for systemic change. This conversation has raised for me issues of governance when people are not in the boardrooms. We are talking about engagement and consultation, but do we also need to consider structures of governance that put people in the room? Community planning partnerships are an attempt in that direction, and they work to some degree in some places but not in others. What are your thoughts on such structural change?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
Before I ask my main question, I want to pick up on something that Luis Yanes spoke about, which is how the individual problem is solved but the systemic issue is not. That has come through in work that I have been doing in another committee, on the Scottish Public Service Ombudsman. One thing that has come up through that work is what happens to people in trauma and how they go into a kind of head-based system, when what is actually going on is quite a lot of emotional challenges, and there is no space for that. I hear that you are saying that moving to a more human rights-based approach is about addressing the system. Is there space for addressing the emotional or traumatic challenges that people often face when they get hooked by something and cannot get free?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
The main question that I want to ask comes back to the point that was initially made by the convener on the human rights bill. That bill will not now be introduced in this parliamentary session, and your recommendation is that it be introduced in the next session. Are you aware of any other bills in the pipeline, such as the Housing (Scotland) Bill, whereby we could look at introducing rights in that way? The housing bill is one example, but is there anything else that you can think of—maybe community wealth building legislation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Ariane Burgess
This has been a brilliant conversation, and I wish we had a few more hours to go into some of the detail that has started to arise in my mind. The intention now is to share the findings across the Highlands and Islands and to enable local communities to use the report to defend and—to use the word that I heard you say—“access” their rights. I would be interested to understand how you plan to use the report to help enable communities to defend and access their rights.