The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5684 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
It is all connected, convener, which is what people have been trying to get at.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
Is that £70 per deer shot?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
I understand that. I will not talk about venison—but we have to talk about the venison.
How can we get the Government to subsidise deer management and give us that carrot? What would that look like on an estate? I see that Ross Ewing is signalling that he would like to answer that.
There is another piece that is not connected to that, but I really want to understand why the Lowlands are different and why they need help. I feel as though that was not cleared up when it was raised earlier. We do not need to go too deeply into that but, for our future work, I want to understand why the Lowlands are being tackled differently.
I want to understand what kind of carrot we really need, because, as a committee, that is the kind of thing that we are interested in. I am hearing that we do not necessarily want strong measures, but we would want there to be more motivation for people. I have heard from people who work with Common Ground, including deer stalkers who work on the ground, about the cost and effort that is required to take one or two deer off a hill. I understand that you can only take two deer off a hill at a time. There is a lot to it that we need to understand.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
Can you give a bit more detail on the pilots? It would be helpful to understand what is going on there.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
I am an MSP for the Highlands and Islands region.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
I think that this is important—
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is definitely a good call-out for communication with students.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
Great. We will get that. Thank you for raising the issue.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
Okay—that is fine. I will bring in Aoife Deery, then Ruth Gilbert.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2025
Ariane Burgess
Item 2 is an evidence-taking session as part of our scrutiny of the Housing (Scotland) Bill. In October, the Minister for Housing indicated to the Parliament that he would seek to lodge stage 2 amendments to the rent controls aspect of the bill to effectively create a maximum rent increase within rent control areas. Those amendments were provided to the committee last week and in this morning’s evidence session we will explore witnesses’ views on them.
We have two panels this morning, reflecting both tenants’ and landlords’ perspectives, and I welcome our first group of witnesses to the table. We have an hour for the discussion, so I would be grateful if we could keep questions and answers as succinct as possible.
We are joined in the room by Lyndsay Clelland, who is policy officer at Age Scotland; Dan Wilson Craw, who is deputy chief executive of Generation Rent; Aoife Deery, who is senior social justice policy officer at Citizens Advice Scotland; Ruth Gilbert, who is a representative from Living Rent, and Natasha McGourt and Nikita Mickevics, who are members of the tenant panel.
We are also joined online by Sai Shraddha Viswanathan, who is president of the National Union of Students Scotland. You can help me out with the pronunciation of your last name, Sai—apologies if I have mangled it.
Before we turn to questions from members, I should say that we will try to direct our questions initially to a specific person, but if you would like to come in, please indicate as much to me or the clerks. There is no need for you to turn your microphones on and off—we will do that for you. It is one less thing for you to think about while you are trying to think about your responses.
Some of what we will talk about is a bit technical, but I would like to open with a question to allow you to gather your thoughts. I think that this question is for everybody, but you can build on it or add something new if you think that it has already been covered.
The Scottish Government states that its proposed amendment
“strikes a balance between increasing protections for tenants with appropriate safeguards for landlords”.
I am interested in hearing whether you agree that the appropriate balance has been struck. Who would like to start?