The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6835 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
And reducing resource—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
I want to come back to the conversation on environmental use, and a point that popped up in Eilidh Ross and Katie Mackay’s responses. Do we need to include the idea of environmental use in the bill in order to link it, in the future, to support payments? Is there something coming down the line in respect of the changes to how we support crofters and farmers that the Government has in mind?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
We have been having a discussion about moving towards more environmental methods—some of you have used the term “rewilding”. We could go down the track of investing quite a lot of money and time in rewilding. Stephen Cranston, you brought up the issue and it sparked something in my mind. We could invest a lot of time and money in rewilding a piece of land, but how can we ensure that it stays in that state if the point of rewilding is to reduce carbon emissions and tackle the nature and climate emergency? Do you see what I am getting at there?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is very helpful. Thanks.
I will move on to my question on the theme of Crofting Commission powers. I am interested in the whole piece around the bill’s aim of ensuring that owner-occupied crofts can be held only by individuals. Some legal and practical problems could arise from that. There are some interesting examples of the Communities Housing Trust trying to create woodland crofts. It is doing something good and needs to hold the crofts as a body, so the legislation might need some exemptions for that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
The woodland crofts team pointed out that it has a project in Glengarry with the Communities Housing Trust. They want to set up a number of new woodland crofts for owner occupation, and a rural housing burden would be attached to the whole crofts. In order to do that, CHT needs to hold the crofts before onward sale can happen, so the team are sitting in the middle of a process, if you see what I mean.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
Are there any other comments on that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
Is what has been highlighted around woodland crofts not really a problem, then?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
I have another example. If the change comes in, will it apply only in the future? For example, Fair Isle, which is owned by the National Trust for Scotland, has lots of crofts on it. Is that a similar situation? Will the NTS own the land but not be the owner-occupier?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 October 2025
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that detail. I would also like to come back to your big concern about the reason for the merger being an underlying cost-saving measure. What would be lost if we went ahead with the merger? You said that it is useful to go to one body for some things and the other body for other things, but what might get lost in the merger if it is a cost-saving effort?