The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6834 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I will sweep up and pick up a question that was skipped over earlier. Do the policies that are set out in the draft NPF4 make provision for meaningful public engagement in the plan-making and development management processes? If not, what changes would you like to be made?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Those were useful responses. We will need to do an evidence session on derelict high streets so that we can dig down into the issue. There are some good examples.
We have a few more minutes before we end. Perhaps we are done but, if there are any other points that any of the witnesses wants to raise about NPF4 that have not been highlighted in the questions that we have asked, please put an R in the chat function.
Caroline Brown has put an R in the chat. Please tell us some more.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Robbie Calvert, do you want to come back in on climate?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
We have a lot of work cut out for us.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that perspective.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Cliff, do you have anything to add on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I know all about the Applecross plan. It is fantastic.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
I really appreciate that. That kind of detail that you are giving us—on the use of the word “unacceptable” in policy 19, for example—is very helpful for us, because we need to understand what you need to know and what people in the sector need to have spelled out so that we are all moving together on this in a good way.
I will bring in my colleague Miles Briggs, who has a number of questions for the panel.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 25 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. That concludes our questions. I think that we have done a good job in covering a lot of ground. The witnesses have made good and important comments in response to our questions. It has been a helpful session. Thank you all for giving up your time and joining us today.
I will suspend briefly to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
11:02 Meeting suspended.Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2022
Ariane Burgess
This has been a brilliant and illuminating discussion that has given me clarity on some points about which I have been mystified. I have a few questions. I will ask them of you all.
Should the Government require public bodies to procure a minimum percentage of their food from suppliers that are based in Scotland, and a minimum percentage of their food from organic farms?
I will do a preamble to my next question. The response from Scottish Land & Estates to the committee’s consultation notes that
“consumers will need an understanding of what constitutes ‘good food’”.
We have touched on that already. It also states:
“This will require clear labelling and a greater understanding of the provenance of Scottish produce.”
I ask the witnesses for their views on the importance and practicalities of enhanced food labelling, which could include the product’s carbon footprint, the method of production for livestock products, whether the food is ultraprocessed and, potentially, other categories.
I am sorry that I am rattling through my questions. I hope that the witnesses get the gist of them. I can jog their memories.
My final question refers to the Scottish Food Coalition’s consultation response, which stresses the importance of aligning
“Government business and trade policy … with the Good Food Nation goals”,
so that business incentives never encourage movement away from the goals. Do Robin Gourlay and Geoff Ogle agree with that recommendation? Do any of the witnesses have suggestions for how that could be achieved in practice?
I ask Mary Brennan to start by picking up on those three questions. They are about procuring from Scotland, food labelling and business incentives that encourage the good food nation goals.