The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5637 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
We will move on to theme 5 and questions from Meghan Gallacher.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
Item 3 is an opportunity for the committee to take evidence to inform its scrutiny of the draft Valuation and Rating (Coronavirus) (Scotland) Order 2021. This is the second of three sessions that the committee is holding on the order.
This year’s programme for government sets out the intention to introduce primary legislation to prevent the use of the material change of circumstances provision in relation to Covid-19. The secondary legislation on the same matter, which relates only to the period since 1 April 2021, is being considered first, as it can be approved within a shorter timescale. Although today’s discussion focuses on the secondary legislation, the same principles and issues will pertain to the upcoming primary legislation, so it is important that we take the time to fully understand and explore the issue.
I welcome our first panel. David Magor is the chief executive of the Institute of Revenues Rating and Valuation. Martin Clarkson is a member of the business rates working group at the Scottish Property Federation. Pete Wildman is the vice-president of the Scottish Assessors Association, and Alastair Kirkwood is a past president of the association. Charles Golding is a senior specialist in valuation and investment advisory at the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors.
We will move straight to questions. I ask witnesses to please type R in the BlueJeans chat function if they wish to respond to a question or to contribute to the discussion. The chat function should not be used to write responses to questions, as they will not be recorded.
The committee understands that many businesses, particularly small ones, have been very hard hit by the pandemic and that the proposed order might feel like another obstacle to recovery. However, we also understand the Scottish Government’s perspective that market-wide economic changes to rateable values should be considered only at the point of revaluation, to ensure fairness to all ratepayers, not all of whom have the resources to lodge appeals.
Do the witnesses believe that material change of circumstances appeals are an appropriate route for supporting businesses in the face of such a widespread impact, or would they like to see alternative forms of business support that might be fairer or more effective?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
The next theme is the principles of taxation, which Martin Clarkson spoke about. To continue with the theme of fairness, does the Scottish Government’s proposal to retrospectively rule out appeals on the basis of Covid-19 run counter to the principles of fairness and certainty that underpin the Scottish Government’s approach to taxation? Is the approach justified by the unprecedented circumstances of the pandemic? Alastair Kirkwood has addressed that to some degree.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thank you, Meghan. We move on to theme 6, which concerns other types of support.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
That is certainly what we have been hearing. Jonathan, do you want to comment on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
I have a supplementary question on the topic, which Jonathan Sharma started to go in the direction of answering.
The Scottish Government’s shared policy programme with the Greens includes a commitment to devolve responsibility to local government to set non-domestic rates. What are your views on that idea? Would that increase revenue for local authorities? Would local authorities have the capacity to take on that additional responsibility in due course?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
We have exhausted our questions. We really appreciate Jonathan Sharma and Kevin Fraser joining us to give us evidence. It has been very helpful for the committee to hear your perspectives.
As previously agreed, we will now take agenda items 4 and 5 in private.
11:40 Meeting continued in private until 12:30.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thanks, Alastair. If we have time at the end, we might come back to that. I see that Pete Wildman would like to comment.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 9 November 2021
Ariane Burgess
We have quite a few questions to get through and about half an hour left for the session. It has been great to get an overview, which has been helpful, but our questions might draw out some of those issues. If you do not mind, in the interest of time, I will move on, but you can perhaps squeeze in more of what you wanted to say if those issues are not drawn out elsewhere. Is that okay?