Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 23 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 6813 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Thanks very much for that picture, Fergus. Just to clarify, you held a consultation over 12 weeks, you got some very useful information, and you have some concerns. With the pause, you are not necessarily going to lose all that work, but you could add to or amend what you have based on the views received and on the amendment bill.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Great, I am glad to hear that the consultation work has not all been undone. If I can hear from Highland Council next, that would be great.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Okay, great. Thanks very much. I will go to Elin Williamson next—no, sorry, I actually have a question for Orkney Islands Council first. Christie Hartley, Scotland’s three all-island local authorities have decided against introducing a visitor levy at this time. Speaking on behalf of them, could you give us a view as to why Orkney Islands Council has decided that?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Thanks very much for that clarity. That is a good point about the cruise ships.

I know that other witnesses have not had a chance to speak yet, but in the interests of time, I will move on to the theme of changes to the basis on which a visitor levy can be charged. I will bring in Meghan Gallacher, who has a number of questions. Meghan, I hope that you can bring in the people who have not spoken yet.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

If the consultation period was shorter, what would be a reasonable amount of time to shorten it to?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

So you think that you could have done it in six weeks.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

From talking to colleagues, is your sense that the 18-month period could reasonably be shortened?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Fergus Murray, you indicated that you wanted to come in, but I will move on and bring in Alexander Stewart, who has questions on additional flexibility—that seems to be today’s word of the day—around the different fixed-amount models. You might want to speak to that issue, and then you can respond to other bits as well.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Please just go ahead.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Visitor Levy (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Ariane Burgess

Gareth Dixon, in the discussions with the Government and with colleagues, has any shorter period been discussed as to what would be reasonable?