The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5861 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Good morning, and welcome to the 20th meeting in 2025 of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. I remind all members and witnesses to ensure that their devices are on silent. Mark Griffin and Fulton MacGregor join us online, and I welcome Evelyn Tweed to the committee. I extend the committee’s thanks to Emma Roddick for her work on the committee.
Our first item of business is to invite Evelyn Tweed to declare any relevant interests.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Okay, but my question was about monitoring and assessing the framework, so do you have detail on that? I know that we are totally in the settling-in period—we have heard that clearly in previous evidence sessions—but what is the Government’s system for monitoring and assessment?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
In the monitoring and assessment work that the Government is doing, could you look at that factor—that planning conditions are not being complied with?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
I will pick up on that point. A number of times, you mentioned stalled sites and your efforts to understand why work is not being taken forward on a significant amount of land that has planning permission. Are you in a position to tell us what you are discovering? You mentioned that resource is an issue.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful. The issue has certainly come up in other areas of our work and in our evidence sessions, so it is good to hear that you are doing that work. The committee would be interested to see the conclusion of that work, when you get to it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
It is about seeing what the blockages are and whether there are patterns in that. How often is it a transport issue? How often is it a section 75 issue? We want to understand that.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Great. We look forward to seeing what you come up with.
I will go online and bring in Mark Griffin.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
That concludes our questions. It has been a useful discussion; it has been great to hear the Government’s position on guidance and to get into some of the details. The fact that a certain number of sites already have planning permission and you are looking into why that is not translating into housing being built on the ground is interesting.
I thank the minister and his officials for their evidence.
10:48 Meeting continued in private until 12:07.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
That concludes our questions, but I will pick up on a few threads, if you do not mind. Fulton MacGregor asked about dynamic documents. As I understand it, RTPI has said that its members and planners in general are finding that, although NPF4 is an unchanging document, many different bits of guidance pop up, so navigating and keeping track of them is a challenge. The metaphor that I use is that it is like walking through a field after a rainstorm and seeing all the mushrooms that have popped up: work is being done on a mycelial Government network and lots of things have appeared, but it is unclear how they link to each other. My sense is that the RTPI is asking for a dashboard or a way of organising all the materials in one place so that it is easy to see it all and where it has been updated. What are your thoughts on that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
My concern is that it would add another layer, in that there would be a requirement to set up a board. I think that Orkney Islands Council has demonstrated a good approach, which is to say, “We are going to set up this board. We are going to do this, get the funding and support the local place plan, rather than creating something new.” I am concerned that we will start to create lots of different streams of activity in communities where we do not have the capacity to manage it all.
When the Dunoon Community Development Trust produced its local place plan, it realised that it needed to create a community action plan. It is interesting that that work has triggered activity beyond the spatial plan. The committee identified early on that there is a connection between what is needed for spatial planning, public services and support for communities. That is quite interesting.
Finally, I want to take us back to the beginning of the conversation. Minister, earlier, you were talking about the fact that there are a certain number of sites that have planning permission. I do not think that the Government can necessarily rule on that but, as an example, I was speaking to a development trust in Highland, which pointed out that, in its area, there were 53 small sites where a private developer had received planning permission for a personal home that was not built, which means that there are 53 houses that could be being built but are not being built. You are all nodding your heads—as you know, one house in a community in rural Scotland can make the difference in keeping a community alive. Is there anything that can be done in the guidance or to create a culture of support for local authorities to somehow find a way to put those sites back into the mix so that communities could take a project forward?