The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5861 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
It was helpful to get a couple of examples of where masterplan consent areas might be used.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Under agenda item 2, do members agree to take agenda items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
The next item of business is to take evidence as part of our annual review of the operation of the fourth national planning framework. We will take evidence from the Minister for Public Finance, Ivan McKee. The minister is joined by Scottish Government officials: Cara Davidson, head of environment and net zero; Andy Kinnaird, head of transforming planning; Fiona Simpson, chief planner and director of planning, architecture and regeneration; and Carrie Thomson, head of development, planning and housing. I welcome the witnesses to the meeting. We have about 90 minutes for the discussion.
I am interested to hear an outline of how the Scottish Government is monitoring the effect of the NPF4 policies on the type and location of developments in Scotland and assessing whether they are meeting the policy priorities, such as compact urban growth and rural revitalisation. Those are examples, but you could speak about others.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Okay, that is great. Do you bring together stakeholder groups on different issues because something flares up, or do you have those in place and monitor things as you go along?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
You mentioned that guidance has been issued, but the committee has heard in evidence that there is a lack of guidance on the assessment of climate and biodiversity impacts and of new developments and that that has been hampering the delivery of NPF4 policy goals in those areas. We are aware that climate adaptation guidance has just been published but that it took more than two years to prepare and that the biodiversity guidance is still not ready. When can we expect that guidance?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
That sounds helpful and useful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
On resource and the time that it has taken for this work to be done, it is great to hear that you are collaborating with NatureScot, but the committee has heard that there are very limited numbers of staff working on the guidance. Therefore, we seek assurance that additional resources can be allocated so that we can speed up delivery, particularly around biodiversity but maybe in other areas, too, as things come forward, as you say, Ivan.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
We are also hearing that there are issues with the biodiversity policy not filtering down to ground-level action. That can happen in relation to what a local authority is doing on the ground, all the way through to decisions that are taken in planning.
For example, it has come up in quite a few conversations that some local authorities think that it is okay to destroy ancient woodland and replace it with new planting. Therefore, we are not getting the weighting right there. How can we convey in guidance that destroying an ancient woodland is a matter of great concern and has far more weight in relation to the climate response than planting a few new trees, which will not do the heavy lifting that we need for our climate emissions?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Meghan Gallacher, did you want to ask a supplementary question?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 June 2025
Ariane Burgess
Great. I am glad that you checked that out. Clearly, there are some areas of the Scottish Government’s website that you could get lost in for a long time, and not quite find what you are looking for.