The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6835 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 1. As there is a tie, I must exercise a casting vote. My casting vote is against the amendment.
Amendment 169 disagreed to.
11:15Amendments 528 and 529 not moved.
Amendment 170 moved—[Meghan Gallacher].
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
There will be a division.
For
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Gallacher, Meghan (Central Scotland) (Con)
Griffin, Mark (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Against
Coffey, Willie (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 3, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 170 agreed to.
Amendment 171 moved—[Meghan Gallacher].
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The question is, that amendment 171 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The committee can commit to keeping the matter under review, too.
The issue of planning fees fits into the bigger picture of the challenges that we have discussed around resources for local planning authorities. One feature of that bigger picture is the fact that not enough new planners are coming in through the pipeline, which is related to the lack of places for people to train as planners in Scotland.
It is a moving piece, with lots of parts. I note in our papers for this morning that it is hoped that the fees will lead to better applications in the first place; however, I have been picking up, certainly in my regional work, that planners used to meet developers and go on site, but that seems to be happening less. The experience for developers now, especially for SMEs—certainly in the Highlands and Islands; maybe it is a distance issue—is that they are not getting on-site information and good up-front insight as to what the local planning authority is looking for in relation to building height, roofing materials and so on. As we have more planners retiring and younger people coming in, we are possibly losing something if there is no transfer of knowledge.
There is something in the mix there, which is beyond these Scottish statutory instruments—I understand that—but I want to put that out there and get your thoughts on it.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The question is, that amendment 164 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 5, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 164 disagreed to.
Amendment 165 moved—[Meghan Gallacher].
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
There will be a division.
For
Gallacher, Meghan (Central Scotland) (Con)
Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Against
Burgess, Ariane (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Coffey, Willie (Kilmarnock and Irvine Valley) (SNP)
Griffin, Mark (Central Scotland) (Lab)
MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP)
Roddick, Emma (Highlands and Islands) (SNP)
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
At this point, we will take a five-minute break.
15:31 Meeting suspended.Section 38—Private residential tenancies: ending a joint tenancy
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Ariane Burgess
I am required to ask whether any member objects to a single question being put on amendments 378 to 382, and I object.
The question is, that amendment 378 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members: No.