The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 700 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
The order does not set any knowledge, training or skills requirements for licence applicants. That is different from the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Skin Piercing and Tattooing) Order 2006, which requires councils to decide whether an applicant is fit and proper, based on their knowledge, skill, training and experience, or that of the people who are doing the work. It is not clear whether local authorities will be expected to make decisions on a similar basis under the new rules, or whether guidance will be issued. Will the minister provide clarity on that point?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
Given that we are talking about the safety of those who access the services, what confidence does the minister have that that issue will be resolved with the UK Government so that those safeguards are in place for people in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
The Coalition of Care and Support Providers in Scotland is concerned by an apparent change in policy on social care pay. It has stated that, instead of increasing the available funds to fund an increase from £12.60, which is the real living wage for 2025-26, to £13.45, which is the real living wage for 2026-27, the Scottish Government seems to have chosen to fund only an increase from the new national living wage in 2026-27. That means that the pay fund would cover an uplift from only £12.71 to £13.45, which is 11p an hour less than providers expected. That will result in a funding shortfall that the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities suggests is £15 million for adult social care services and £4 million for children’s services. Will the cabinet secretary confirm that the fund to increase pay and conditions in social care has been baselined to the national living wage rather than the real living wage as expected?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
What consultation did the Government have with the sector on the implications of that decision for jobs and services? Was an equality impact assessment completed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
Good morning. The Scottish Care response to the Scottish Government consultation on the draft circular economy strategy in January 2026 stated:
“Without targeted support to achieve this vision, care providers will struggle to implement circular practices effectively, risking further service reductions and loss of choice for individuals who rely on care.”
What further support is needed for social care to ensure that it can meet targets for waste reduction and embedding circular practices?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
That is great—thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
A number of health professional leadership bodies, led by the Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, have written “A Manifesto for Health and Climate”, which calls on us to
“Urgently accelerate the electronic prescribing programme, by allocating appropriate resource.”
Do the witnesses have any thoughts on what impact that could have on NHS sustainability? I will go to Joanna Teuton first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
The Scottish Parliament cannot scrutinise any potential section 104 order in the same way as it can the section 30 order. What does the Scottish Government propose to do to keep the Parliament as involved and informed as possible, should any section 104 order be laid?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
To what extent could the climate change plan and Government policy be bolder in applying the polluter-pays principle?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Gillian Mackay
In its submission to the committee, the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh recommended making
“the healthy, low-carbon choice the easiest and most affordable”.
To what extent is that enabled by the climate change plan, and how could the plan be improved in that regard?
10:15