The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 507 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful, thank you. My next question is linked to cladding but also the proposed building safety levy. What is the estimate for the total amount of Scottish Government funding that would be required for evidence gathering, single building assessments, remediation work and future monitoring requirements, and what role would a potential levy play in that, if any?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Is that a cast-iron guarantee that the bill will come through before the end of this parliamentary session?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
What happens if the UK Government’s plan does not come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
I will start with questions on the EPC validity time period. It is proposed that the period will reduce from 10 years to five years. John Blackwood, I hope that you do not mind, but I raised the concerns that the Scottish Association of Landlords has about the reduction with the previous panel. I will put my question to you first. What would you like to see changed in the proposed timeframe? Should we be sticking with 10 years or should we be following the alternative proposal that has been outlined?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you. Bryan Leask, do you have any comments on the reduction in the validity timeframe?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
I agree. Scottish Land & Estates and other stakeholders have called for a rural impact assessment. You are right: if we are to go down the route of such assessments, they have to be meaningful and all those aspects must be explored. Again, your answers leave a lot of unanswered questions, but it was good to hear your thoughts.
I move on to the workings of the UK and Scottish Governments. Should there be closer working between them on EPC reform? Would that be better for landlords who have properties across the UK, to ensure some uniformity? What needs to happen to ensure that implementation is successful? I do not know whether Bryan Leask or John Blackwood wants to come in first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is really helpful. Thank you both very much.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you. That is helpful.
If witnesses will bear with me, I would like to expand on a point that Gillian Campbell raised in relation to landlords. We will hear from the Scottish Association of Landlords on our next panel. In its submission, it states that it has concerns regarding this particular proposal, because
“it will increase costs for landlords without delivering significant additional value”.
It also states:
“The energy efficiency of most properties will not materially change within five years”
and asks for a “more proportionate approach”, which would be to
“require a new EPC at the first letting”
following the minimum energy efficiency standard—MEES—compliance date and to
“retain the 10-year validity period thereafter”.
Does anyone have thoughts on those concerns or, indeed, alternative proposals?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
It goes back to the argument about up-front costs versus potential benefits that could follow thereafter, and the up-front costs will be daunting for many home owners up and down the country with these reforms coming through.