The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1307 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
No, it is not right.
10:30
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The context that we are in includes the cost of living issues, which are on everyone’s minds, and other issues such as water bills, which were mentioned by the witnesses in the previous panel. Does the minister understand that there are varying contexts for the amount of pressure that is being put on businesses and that the revaluation of rates has exacerbated that problem?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
It appears that, through these regulations, the Scottish Government has treated licensed hospitality premises and self-catering properties differently from other types of property. Can you explain why that is?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Let us move to the process and the methods of revaluation itself. What needs to change about the process and the methodology of conducting valuations? What would be beneficial to the business sector? I do not know who wants to kick off on that—I know that it is a huge question.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to prevent further job losses in the oil and gas supply chain as a result of the energy transition. (S6O-05673)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Under the Scottish National Party Government and the UK Labour Government, the oil and gas industry is losing 1,000 jobs a month, which is having a catastrophic impact not just in the north-east but in industrial areas such as Grangemouth and Mossmorran. Does the cabinet secretary accept that, in order to save jobs across Scotland and to ensure our energy security, the SNP must reverse its reckless opposition to new oil and gas? Does she agree that we must drill Rosebank to secure our own energy future?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Amendment 7 is similar to the amendment that I lodged at stage 2. It relates to transitional arrangements. The amendment would exempt from the levy a new residential unit where a building warrant application has been submitted on or before 1 April 2028—in other words, where a development has progressed before the legislation’s commencement date. The approach matches the established principle that regulatory treatment follows the rules that are in force at the time of a building warrant application, and it recognises the significant up-front investment in viability decisions that are taken without published levy rates.
Home builders have been clear in explaining that development does not simply start when the foundations are cut. There are years of planning processes, as well as investment, before buildings are constructed. The liability date ignores the investment in the land deal, ground investigations, planning costs and professional fees for design that a developer has already borne before they start building and well before the building is completed.
A retrospective levy risks stalling delivery and hindering much-needed investment. I am certain that the minister does not wish the building of homes to be stalled, considering that the next Government needs to deliver at pace to tackle the housing emergency that Michael Marra has just outlined in his speech.
The minister has agreed to provide 22 months’ notice of rates from June this year, but there has been no consideration that developers will already have appraised and agreed land deals without taking into account the fact that the levy will come into effect from April 2028.
Homes for Scotland has been crystal clear that, without transitional arrangements in place, neither it nor the wider sector can support the bill in principle. I take the opportunity at this point to thank Homes for Scotland for its support and engagement throughout the passage of the bill.
It is for those reasons that I urge the Parliament to agree to my amendment 7 or to amendment 6 in the name of Michael Marra. I believe that both amendments attempt to resolve the outstanding issues. I will leave my remarks there.
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 23:52]
Meeting date: 17 March 2026
Meghan Gallacher
When we first debated the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill, I said that I would not support legislation that risked further damaging Scotland’s housing sector. At stage 2 and at stage 3 today, we had the chance to fix the bill, but those opportunities were missed. In my view, the Scottish Government has not engaged in the way that it should have done—constructively—with all parties on issues that have been raised not just by the relevant sectors but by house builders and home owners who have been impacted by cladding. As a result, the Scottish Conservatives will not support the bill at decision time.
We all agree that building safety is not optional and we all recognise the tragedy of Grenfell and why remediation is required on all affected buildings.
The real question is this: is the bill the right way to fund cladding remediation, or is it yet another knee-jerk response from a Government that has failed to act properly and at pace? In my view, it is the latter.