The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1187 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 12:28]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
On a point of order, Presiding Officer.
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 12:28]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I seek your guidance, Presiding Officer, because that was a disgusting and disgraceful intervention by Patrick Harvie. I have not wasted the Parliament’s time. I have tried to seek consensus in bringing forward a piece of legislation that a veterans group asked me to bring to the Parliament in order to improve the lives of our veterans and armed forces community. I will never apologise for the work that I have undertaken in that field. I hope that Patrick Harvie reflects on his comments. [Interruption.]
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I live in hope that the new agency will help to deliver the increase in house building that Scotland desperately needs. However, history tells us that SNP quangos rarely deliver for Scotland.
Almost two years ago, this Parliament declared a national housing emergency, and ministers in this chamber promised urgent action. Creating a new housing agency that will not even be operational until 2028 is not decisive action—it is kicking the can down the road.
What will the Scottish Government do right now—not in two years’ time—to support the building of more homes by supporting the private sector and to tackle the appalling backlog in social housing?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I live in hope that the new agency will help to deliver the increase in house building that Scotland desperately needs. However, history tells us that SNP quangos rarely deliver for Scotland.
Almost two years ago, this Parliament declared a national housing emergency, and ministers in this chamber promised urgent action. Creating a new housing agency that will not even be operational until 2028 is not decisive action—it is kicking the can down the road.
What will the Scottish Government do right now—not in two years’ time—to support the building of more homes by supporting the private sector and to tackle the appalling backlog in social housing?
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 21:07]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I live in hope that the new agency will help to deliver the increase in house building that Scotland desperately needs. However, history tells us that SNP quangos rarely deliver for Scotland.
Almost two years ago, this Parliament declared a national housing emergency, and ministers in this chamber promised urgent action. Creating a new housing agency that will not even be operational until 2028 is not decisive action—it is kicking the can down the road.
What will the Scottish Government do right now—not in two years’ time—to support the building of more homes by supporting the private sector and to tackle the appalling backlog in social housing?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you. I am conscious of time, convener, so I will move on to my next question.
There is a debate about whether the fixed-rate model for accommodation providers and customers should be a fixed rate per unit as opposed to per person. I would be interested to hear, briefly, from one or two local authorities why per unit is not favourable and why there seems to be more emphasis on per person.
10:00
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
You have given ripe descriptions of how complicated it could turn out to be for those who are having to administer the levy. I do not have any further questions, convener.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
It is in relation to contingency and future proofing against potential compliance loss and collection error. I can use Glasgow City Council as an example, because its modelling has shown a 5 per cent levy generating £16.9 million—approximately £4.86 per night—while the proposed tiered banded model could generate £23.6 million, but it comes with significantly higher complexity around the modelling. The question is about compliance and the loss that is generated and what suits local authorities alongside the sector to simplify the model and make it the best possible model.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. I hope to find out a little bit more about how multiple schemes might operate, or not, in a local authority area. My understanding is that we need the system to be simplified so that it is easy to understand and process. I see a couple of nodding heads.
Marc, you are looking at me, so I will come to you first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you for that.
I raised with the previous panel the example of Glasgow City Council and the operational risks and impact of a complex system in relation to pricing, variable lengths of stay and multiple booking platforms, which we have just been discussing. Have you had any contact with local authorities on the contingency modelling that they might or might not have done? Has there been any back-and-forth between the sector and local authorities? I am assuming, again, that that will be really important when it comes to mitigating risks.
Perhaps Marc Crothall or Fiona MacConnacher can take that question—or someone online, perhaps.