The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1171 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That would be helpful. Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you, convener, and good morning to the witnesses. I am interested in how multiple schemes could operate within a local authority area. Certainly, it appears to me that, if the visitor levy is to go ahead and be implemented in local authority areas, it has to be a system that is simple, easy to process and not overburdensome for the operators, by which I mean all the people who work in the sector.
I am looking to find out what the operational risks are of having multiple schemes running, in the context of dynamic pricing, variable length of stay and multiple booking platforms. What contingency modelling has been done—if any local authority has done such modelling—specifically in relation to compliance loss and collection error?
I am not sure who might want to pick up on that, but I am interested to hear from those who have not been able to come in yet.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I have a brief supplementary question for Malcolm MacLeod. I appreciate the remarks that you have made on flexibility for local authorities, but can you understand how difficult it could be for an accommodation provider that works across more than one local authority area, if, for example, one local authority area decides to go with per unit and another decides to go with per person? You can surely understand that a simplified system would then no longer be simple and would become complex for accommodation providers to operate. Some providers might decide to leave the sector entirely, because it is just not workable for them.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
On Fergus Murray’s point, I appreciate that a shorter time between decision and implementation would make it easier for local authorities, but I want to return to the businesses that will have to navigate the implementation period. Would you be open to amending section 17 of the 2024 act, so that no levy liability arises unless both the transaction and the stay occur after the formal commencement date? Would you support that change to the implementation timeframe in order to protect businesses further?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That was helpful.
In the interests of time, because I know that lots of colleagues want to come in, I will move on. There has been discussion and debate on whether there should be a fixed rate per unit, as opposed to a fixed rate per person. My understanding is that the sector has been quite critical of such an approach and has said that it strongly opposes per-person charging, because it is intrusive, unworkable and likely to generate errors and disputes.
I am keen to hear from our online panel members on this question. I am not sure whether Fiona Campbell, David Weston or Sheila Gilmore wants to come in, but does anyone have anything specific to say on per-unit or per-person charging?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful. Has the Scottish Government conducted any research or done further work with the hospitality sector, because we know that, roughly, an additional 20,000 hospitality jobs have gone since September 2025 and 9,000 since the last UK budget. The revaluation seems to penalise success in that it works against hospitality businesses that have grown and have employed more people, rather than being something that they can co-operate with and move on from. Is there any analysis that would be able to measure how many jobs and businesses might be impacted as a result of the decision?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The Scottish Retail Consortium has told the committee that the 15 per cent rates relief for the retail, hospitality and leisure sector that you mentioned is an encouraging start but, of course, it is less generous at every level than in England. What is the Scottish Government’s response to that? I appreciate that you have written to your UK Government counterparts on the issue but, as it stands, the offering in Scotland is less generous than that in other parts of the United Kingdom.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The international development fund will increase by 25 per cent compared with last year. At the same time, the alcohol and drugs budget is being cut by around £1.3 million in real terms, and the health capital budget is being cut by almost £50 million. Our constituents will be wondering why those issues were not as high up the priority list as international development.
Will the Scottish Government simply get on with the priorities of hard-working Scots: building hospitals, improving public services and addressing Scotland’s shameful drug deaths crisis, which remains the worst in Europe?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government how the increase in the international development fund that was announced in the draft 2026-27 Scottish budget will be spent. (S6O-05407)