The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1154 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 21:07]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I live in hope that the new agency will help to deliver the increase in house building that Scotland desperately needs. However, history tells us that SNP quangos rarely deliver for Scotland.
Almost two years ago, this Parliament declared a national housing emergency, and ministers in this chamber promised urgent action. Creating a new housing agency that will not even be operational until 2028 is not decisive action—it is kicking the can down the road.
What will the Scottish Government do right now—not in two years’ time—to support the building of more homes by supporting the private sector and to tackle the appalling backlog in social housing?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 29 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
I live in hope that the new agency will help to deliver the increase in house building that Scotland desperately needs. However, history tells us that SNP quangos rarely deliver for Scotland.
Almost two years ago, this Parliament declared a national housing emergency, and ministers in this chamber promised urgent action. Creating a new housing agency that will not even be operational until 2028 is not decisive action—it is kicking the can down the road.
What will the Scottish Government do right now—not in two years’ time—to support the building of more homes by supporting the private sector and to tackle the appalling backlog in social housing?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The international development fund will increase by 25 per cent compared with last year. At the same time, the alcohol and drugs budget is being cut by around £1.3 million in real terms, and the health capital budget is being cut by almost £50 million. Our constituents will be wondering why those issues were not as high up the priority list as international development.
Will the Scottish Government simply get on with the priorities of hard-working Scots: building hospitals, improving public services and addressing Scotland’s shameful drug deaths crisis, which remains the worst in Europe?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government how the increase in the international development fund that was announced in the draft 2026-27 Scottish budget will be spent. (S6O-05407)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government how the increase in the international development fund that was announced in the draft 2026-27 Scottish budget will be spent. (S6O-05407)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The international development fund will increase by 25 per cent compared with last year. At the same time, the alcohol and drugs budget is being cut by around £1.3 million in real terms, and the health capital budget is being cut by almost £50 million. Our constituents will be wondering why those issues were not as high up the priority list as international development.
Will the Scottish Government simply get on with the priorities of hard-working Scots: building hospitals, improving public services and addressing Scotland’s shameful drug deaths crisis, which remains the worst in Europe?
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:54]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
The international development fund will increase by 25 per cent compared with last year. At the same time, the alcohol and drugs budget is being cut by around £1.3 million in real terms, and the health capital budget is being cut by almost £50 million. Our constituents will be wondering why those issues were not as high up the priority list as international development.
Will the Scottish Government simply get on with the priorities of hard-working Scots: building hospitals, improving public services and addressing Scotland’s shameful drug deaths crisis, which remains the worst in Europe?
Meeting of the Parliament [Last updated 19:54]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
To ask the Scottish Government how the increase in the international development fund that was announced in the draft 2026-27 Scottish budget will be spent. (S6O-05407)
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful, cabinet secretary.
We know that roughly £97 million of Barnett consequentials have been sent through in relation to cladding, and we also had a debate last week on the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill. Can you clarify how much of the Barnett consequential funding has been spent so far? You have talked about upscaling the spend in that area, but it would be good to know how much of the Barnett consequential money has already been spent.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 January 2026
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful, and I look forward to receiving your letter.
I will pick up on that briefly and move to a question about RAAC in a second. I know that you are having to increase the spend for carrying out cladding remediation work. The importance of building safety is widely accepted. No one will dispute it. However, there are concerns over a disparity, in that the Finance and Public Administration Committee has reported that the building safety levy would raise £30 million a year. I know that that will be scrutinised in the Parliament over the next few weeks. Will the figure be clarified at that stage, so that whatever committee that will be dealing with it or scrutinising a part of it knows exactly what the figures are?