The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3402 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
The point that I made about the issues that the review raised about leadership.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
We will keep a watching brief.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
I just want to make a point, convener. Given the time and the need for brevity, I will conclude with this. Because of the way that the narratives are written, there was a clear risk, which you acknowledge, cabinet secretary, of the situation being interpreted in the way that I have suggested, in relation to section 40 of the 2010 act. It is the fact that you mentioned that section that led me to ask those questions.
We all know that we are in the business of words, and that the way that we talk and write about things often betrays the way that we think about things. I will leave it at this, but I wanted to test, as I have done, whether the section 40 legal requirement not to give directions has, even subconsciously, been breached in the way that the budget is presented. I hear what the cabinet secretary says, but I want to put this on the record. There is a clear legal responsibility on the cabinet secretary not to get to that level of specificity, but there is a risk of the narrative in the level 4 worksheet leading one to presume that that happened.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
According to the SPICe briefing, your organisation’s budget for the coming year is going to increase by 26 per cent from the budget that you were allocated a year ago. That is quite an increase. In cash terms, compared with the autumn budget revision figures for the current budget year, it is 13 per cent. How much of the £101 million that you are expected to get is ring fenced?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
I want you to acknowledge your decisions in relation to that funding. It is a continuation of the cash amount, which has stayed the same since 2008. In fact, it went backwards for a number of years and is now catching up, almost, with 2008. I know that you take a lot of interest in world-class cultural output from our country, but your decisions are leading to damage to those esteemed national performing companies.
Before you respond to that comment, can you tell us how much money is in the international touring fund for 2026-27, or has it been closed? I accept that you may need to ask an official.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
Sorry—£111 million. I keep getting the number wrong.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
That is okay.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
The ring-fenced funding is pretty much all accounted for, is it not?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
But you are aware that that is what it says in the level 4 spreadsheet line. It is quite directional regarding spending?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Stephen Kerr
Obviously, the review landed in a place where you say that you are doing some of that, but that is not the impression that one would get from reading the review. It calls for some pretty fundamental transparency and I will be interested to see how you respond to that in practice. I hear what you are saying about what you currently do, but that is what you were doing when the review was conducted. The outcome of the review was a critique of that and it says that you can do a lot more.