The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2972 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
You introduced the idea of protections for the original owner in case of theft or, indeed, of fraud. Under the bill, how is it expected that the original owners would obtain effective redress?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
No—and I certainly did not. My background, like yours, is certainly not in law. In all honesty, it makes me somewhat uneasy to hear the kinds of things that Fraser Gough has presented to us this morning. The bill is written in the language of legal experts, as it were, but in terms that laypeople—as I will call us—will not readily understand or recognise. That leads to concerns about how people will operate within a law that they do not really understand.
One area of concern relates to acquisition. The bill protects acquirers “in good faith”, but it does not say what “good faith” means. I apologise to the minister, because—with great respect to him—I am almost looking past him, towards Fraser Gough, when I ask my question. The bill does not say what “good faith” means and it does not talk about due diligence at all. Why, in drafting the bill, did you go down that route? I put the question to the minister, but I am sure that he will want to refer it to others.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
My point is specifically about “good faith” and what that means, and the issue of due diligence, particularly with regard to incorporeal assets.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Would that not be because we are talking about something that is an intangible? If you were buying an object, such as a house or whatever, you would have it in front of you. As digital assets are intangible, do they not require an additional layer of protection for buyers?
10:15Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
There is no intention that there should be any particular redress mechanisms.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Is there no intention that the bill would provide protection to the original owner?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
Minister, I think that we are fellow graduates of the University of Stirling, but neither of us did law.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
That is quite clear. I do not know why I said that, because nothing is quite clear about this bill, but, in this instance, I think that it is.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
—come under the bill to the detriment of future policy, the consumer and the environment?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Stephen Kerr
You make it sound like some kind of Pandora’s box.