The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1701 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I will bring in Elli Kontorravdis on that. First, as an overview, I note that, in bringing so many treaties together—some of them for the first time—we are leading the way and being ambitious. They sit together with all the different reserved and devolved powers, as well as the European convention on human rights, and we are navigating all those spaces that have different rules, regulations and scopes. To bring those all together, we have to work systemically and systematically to ensure that whatever we have actually has an impact on people’s lives. I always try to remember that that is the bigger aim. It is not a paperwork exercise or a challenge in that sense; the challenge is how effective the system will be and whether all the legislation sits together. Perhaps I can bring in Elli on further details of the compatibilities.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:We absolutely recognise and accept the challenges, but overall, we have seen good progress towards the aims of “Scotland’s Equality Evidence Strategy 2023-2025”. It is really important to get that evidence and, over the lifetime of that strategy, we have seen an increase in the availability of equality and intersectional data across a wide range of policy areas, including Social Security Scotland, transport, health, social care and education.
We have improved the accessibility of that equality evidence through updates to our equality evidence finder, the publication of our 2023 gender equality index and the production of a number of detailed quantitative and qualitative reports examining the lived experience of people across Scotland, including non-binary people and minority ethnic groups. We have shared that work alongside other examples of good practice in collecting, analysing and producing equality evidence both internally and externally. An evaluation of the strategy is under way and is due to be published in the spring, and it will provide an assessment of improvements to the equality evidence base and identify areas for improvement to be taken forward in the next strategy.
We are not complacent. It is important to recognise the progress that we have made, but I absolutely accept that we have much further to go.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I will bring in Elli Kontorravdis on the human rights tracker tool, because I think that where you are going with that question is about how we track such things and how all the different organisations will be enabled to fulfil their obligations. If Elli can speak about the human rights tracker tool, that might be helpful.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I believe that the Scottish Government took a strong leadership role in response to the concerning scenes and rhetoric that we saw especially over the summer. We did that to ensure that we acknowledge the hard work that goes on at grass-roots level to bring communities together. We have strong, cohesive communities and there has been good work over the years, but we have realised that that can be quite fragile, so we want to invest in and protect that.
I secured additional funding of about £300,000, which was specifically targeted at grass-roots community organisations. To ensure that that money did not get caught up in administrative matters, we partnered with the STV children’s appeal, which already has structures for that sort of work. When I was up in Dundee just last week, I saw the impact of that funding in bringing communities together in safe spaces where people can talk about their real and legitimate concerns, including the continuing cost of living crisis and access to services to meet their day-to-day needs. I also know that some organisations have invested in training staff to have de-escalation conversations or to deal with misinformation and disinformation at community level, so that we are reaching the people who are having those conversations.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:No, I would not go as far as that. You put your question in such stark terms, but the answer is not straightforward. I believe that we are collecting that data, although I acknowledge that there are complexities in bringing it together. We have talked before about the fact that the numbers are sometimes very small, and they have to be statistically viable, so there are challenges there.
The equality evidence finder is a very useful tool—I will perhaps bring in Kevin McGowan to drill down into the technical detail.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:That is indeed about resources, but cultural change is about mindset. We start with the premise that human rights are for everybody and that, by the very virtue of being a human, you are entitled to those basic rights. We need to keep that aim in mind, whatever else we do on top of that. To back that up, we need to take people with us, ensuring that they have plenty of time for that development of understanding.
A lot of good work has gone on in that respect. I have already mentioned to the committee the mainstreaming work that I have undertaken this past year. We launched the mainstreaming suite of resources on 8 December 2025. It includes a strategy, a groundbreaking toolkit and the action plan. Together, the mainstreaming suite lays the best conditions to embed a human rights culture.
I believe that the strategy provides a clear vision and framework for changing how we develop policies, deliver services and allocate resources. On a technical level, the action plan brought together 61 of our actions, which align to the six key drivers that are outlined in the strategy. It also focuses on Scottish Government actions. It brings together all the different resources in a way that makes them accessible and comprehensive.
I cannot give you exact examples of the resources, because more than 100 are available. However, it is about capacity building and evolving. As we discover more resources that are helpful, we will add those to the bank of resources. Doing so lays out the best possible conditions to ensure that we are all committed to moving forward on a human rights agenda.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I do not understand your question about collecting data on characteristics that are not protected, because race is a protected characteristic.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I am sorry—will you repeat that? I did not hear. I am hard of hearing; forgive me.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:I do not have the equally safe delivery plan in front of me, but from what I recall, it contains specific actions that are related to that. I will bring in Kevin McGowan to respond.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kaukab Stewart
:Obviously, the ultimate aim is that the content of the high-level action plan is integrated into the forthcoming human rights tracker, which will in time support us to report on those actions and outcomes to both domestic and international committees.
As I said in my opening remarks, I will launch the tracker on 12 March. We have given an invitation to the clerks, which I think is being taken up, but it would be very helpful for committee members to look at the tracker, so that you can get a practical insight into what it looks like, what it feels like and how effective it is.
The intent of that tool is to help improve transparency and to enhance the implementation efforts on the recommendations that we receive from the human rights treaty bodies. The first phase of that is an accessible database of recommendations with the aim of further enabling us all to take strategic and co-ordinated action in devolved areas. Our intention is that the national human rights institutions, the Scottish Parliament, civil society and the rights holders will be better able, via the tracker, to review the recommendations and, ultimately, scrutinise the actions taken and the outcomes achieved.
As I have said, this committee plays a critical role in human rights scrutiny, so I encourage members to attend the launch and have a look at the tracker.