The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 875 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I think that I get Maggie Chapman’s point, given the Lord President’s power over the legal professions. From the consumer’s point of view, I suppose that it is about transparency. That is the more serious point. It is important that decisions are transparent and open, that there are enough checks and balances in the system and that transparency is provided for. I think that that is the point that Maggie was trying to make.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Before we move on to our second evidence panel of the morning, I ask for any declarations of interest.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you very much. We have come to the end of our evidence session, but I want to give you the opportunity to bring anything to the committee’s attention that we have not covered. This is your time.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you, once again, for your evidence.
That concludes our business in public. We will consider the remaining item on our agenda in private.
11:40 Meeting continued in private until 12:07.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for that. The diagrams were exceptionally helpful and I say that not just as a teacher who loves diagrams. [Laughter.] They do illustrate things.
I will ask for clarification on a few points. The diagram of the current regulatory framework says that the
“Scottish ministers have duty to consult Lord President”.
What does that involve? Is that a legal duty to consult and if so, on what, for example? How do you know that ministers have consulted? Does that transfer into decisions? I am interested in what power ministers have at the moment.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you very much. I will kick off the questions; my colleagues will then come in.
Lady Dorrian, you mentioned the role of the Lord President. I want to give you an opportunity to unpick that a little bit. Can you give us some practical examples of the role of the Lord President and the implications of the bill for what the Lord President would or would not be able to do?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
The minister has indicated that amendments will be lodged that should allay some of the concerns that have been robustly raised, but we do not know what those amendments will be. In that wriggle room, would either of you like to give me an indication of what those amendments could be that would address your concerns?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Fair enough.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I have been listening really carefully and would like to come back on a few points. I would like to generate more discussion about the consumer’s perspective, because we have taken lots of evidence on the lawyer’s point of view and every other view. Can you give us some insight into how the consumer’s point of view informed your report, whether your views have developed on that and whether the consumer is served well by the bill in its current state?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I have a final question before I bring Karen Adam in on that theme. I am interested in how the Lord President takes the views of consumers into account when he is carrying out his regulatory functions. For example, are there any formal processes to ensure that consumer views are considered in addition to the views of the legal profession?