The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 875 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 30 January 2024
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you, Clare.
Is Fulton MacGregor content with those responses? Would you like to come back in, Fulton? I see that he is content.
That concludes our formal business this morning. I thank all of our witnesses for joining us and for playing such a valuable part in our work as scrutineers. Once again, I thank them very much for their attendance. I hope that the rest of the day is enjoyable.
We will now move into private session.
11:07 Meeting continued in private until 11:39.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Meghan, did you want to come in on this issue?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
We will pause that for now. I will bring you back in after Meghan Gallacher.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for answering that rather cheeky question, minister. We are all well aware that the initial stages of the bill did not happen on your watch, as it were. Thank you for taking that question regardless.
I think that we all understand that reform is difficult for any organisation. As I sit here, I have been imagining the uproar that would probably be caused among members, let alone anyone else, if there was a bill to reform the Scottish Parliament, and we have only a couple of decades of history. I understand that change and reform are difficult, especially when they are applied to a highly regarded legal profession that has been there for hundreds and hundreds of years.
I am grateful that you have taken the time to give evidence today and that you have written to us. I will take you up on your offer to communicate with us fully, because we wish to do our job correctly and make sure that the reforms are robust and proportionate. In the light of that, I will also take you up on the offer you made in your opening remarks when you mentioned your letter to me. You said that you could go through the sections in the annex and offer a bit more information on them. That would be helpful for our scrutiny, so could you do that, minister?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I am sorry to interrupt you, minister, but we have that documentation in front of us. In the interest of time, I will stop you, as that letter has been published and it is available to the public. I simply wanted to give you the opportunity to add anything further that you wanted to say.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I just indicated to Maggie Chapman that I wanted to come in on the complaints issue as well, to get a bit more information.
We heard evidence from the SL—I can never remember initials and I do not think that they are a good thing, as they exclude people—from the SLCC regarding the powers that it has. On the one hand it welcomed the changes, but it also argued for more powers. What consideration was given to giving the SLCC more powers?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Okay. Leanna, did you want to come in?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
We agree. Thank you. We will write to the Scottish Government to that effect.
That concludes consideration of the UK statutory instrument. I thank the minister and her officials for their attendance. We will now suspend briefly to allow a changeover of supporting officials for our next agenda item. Thank you.
09:52 Meeting suspended.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Our second agenda item is our final evidence session on the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill.
I again welcome to the meeting Siobhian Brown, the Minister for Victims and Community Safety. I also welcome her supporting officials from the Scottish Government: Jamie Wilhelm is legal services regulation reform manager in the justice directorate, and Leanna MacLarty is a solicitor in the legal directorate. Thank you for joining us this morning. I refer members to papers 2 and 3. I invite the minister to make a brief opening statement.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Good morning and welcome to the 26th meeting of 2023 of the Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee. We have received no apologies this morning.
Our first agenda item is consideration of a type 1 consent notification for the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Saving Provision) Regulations 2023. This is a proposed United Kingdom statutory instrument on which the UK Government is seeking the Scottish Government’s consent to legislate in an area of devolved competence. On 9 November 2023, the Minister for Victims and Community Safety notified the committee of the UK SI. The committee’s role is to decide whether it agrees with the Scottish Government’s proposal to consent to the UK Government in the manner that it has indicated.
I welcome to the meeting Siobhian Brown, who is the Minister for Victims and Community Safety, and her supporting officials. Simon Stockwell is head of family law policy and Stephanie Smith is a senior policy adviser on courts and tribunals. Both are from the Scottish Government’s justice directorate. Good morning and thank you for joining us.
I refer members to paper 1 and I invite the minister to make a brief opening statement.