The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1649 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
That is a really good question. I will not name any specific organisations, but I will give a general overview. I have visited a wide variety of organisations that are based in the heart of our communities. One reason why I will not mention names is that, unfortunately, some groups have drawn negative attention and been targeted as a result of the work that they have done in relation to anti-racism, for example, so I want to avoid that.
When I ask such organisations how we reach the people we need to reach—those who feel disenfranchised—I am reassured by the fact that the organisations are based in the heart of communities. That is one reason why STV, not the Government, is distributing the fund. It has extensive networks and is very experienced in doing such work, in creating new opportunities and in enhancing current ones.
The organisations gave me the example of outreach workers, who go into the heart of communities and communicate with people wherever the touch points are. People are bound to attend a centre of some sort, whether it is a leisure centre, a general practitioner surgery or a shopping centre. Those outreach workers have conservations in which people can express their concerns or views, and they can signpost those people to services or have difficult conversations with them. That is very skilled work. Some people might be applying for £50 from the fund, whereas others might be applying for much more. There is no prerequisite, because I want the fund to be as flexible, responsive and accessible as possible so that we can reach the very people you are talking about.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
We have made it very clear, as I have said—thank you for the opportunity to restate it again—that the Scottish Government accepts the Supreme Court ruling. We expect everyone to comply with the law.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
The PSED was introduced due to the desire to see tangible improvements for our society. That positive vision is clearly set out in the three underlying goals that I mentioned. Since the PSED was created as part of the Equality Act 2010, we have seen significant improvements to some groups’ experiences of equalities and rights. For example, we now have equal marriage, stronger hate crime laws, new domestic abuse laws, a more robust approach to using equality evidence and significantly more investment in equality groups.
However, as the PSED is a due regard duty, it procedural. It cannot be used to require public bodies to act in certain ways beyond what might be provided under the Scotland-specific duties which are in themselves restricted due to the “due regard” part of the duty.
It might be helpful for the committee to understand the interactions and complexities, so I will bring in Vuyi Stutley.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
Just to help you—I did actually see that bit.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
Apologies, convener. I was invited to come between 11 and 12, so I scheduled an extra half hour on top of that, and we are now over that as well. If there are any further questions that members feel they need answers to, the committee can—as always—write to me, and I will be happy to supply the information in writing.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
Dissatisfaction. However, it is not within my gift and control. It is also unfortunate that, in the short time that I have had here, I have not also been able to go into regulation 11, which I was able to use for the first time. I have not had the opportunity to discuss, or been asked about, the use of regulation 12. I have also not had the opportunity to talk about our mainstreaming toolkit. There are many areas that I have not been able to cover but that come under the inquiry and the public sector equality duty.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
Respectfully, that is not within my scope. That is for the committee to decide.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
I am sorry, but could you repeat that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
Nick Bland can kick off and then I will come in.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 January 2026
Kaukab Stewart
I will bring Nick Bland in to comment on that.