The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1144 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning. The final part of your report talks about a better future and makes 18 recommendations about how the service could be modernised. The report discusses stakeholder views that a more personalised and holistic approach should be taken to deciding eligibility for ADP. What positives do you see in that, and might there be a bit of concern about how that could lead to subjective decision making at the same time, if we are taking a really person-centred approach to assessing eligibility?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
In our pre-budget scrutiny, we heard from stakeholders that, even at local health and social care partnership or local authority level, how spending decisions were made and how they would impact on disabled communities were not always transparent. Your report states:
“The Scottish Government”—
and others, I think—
“should consider ... an equalities-based budgeting approach”
and have that mainstreamed as part of what happens. Will you expand on how such an approach might change social security spending in the longer term?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
That is very helpful. As somebody who has filled in a form for an individual who has avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and tried to qualify how that impacts on their life, I agree that the form is lacking in that regard. Thank you for putting that on the record.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
This line of questioning leads into the questions that I had on the wider outcomes. Your report states that the situation is a bit “fragmented” when it comes to policies that have an impact on disabled people, notwithstanding the fact that the Scottish Government published its “Disability Equality Plan” in the summer.
What would the practical impact be if we had a less fragmented policy approach to supporting disabled people? How might that affect decision making on social security policy, given that ADP is not a means-tested benefit, as Mr Balfour mentioned? It is a matter of addressing the disability premium that people have to cover in their day-to-day existence.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
That is very helpful. The report says that the activities and descriptors need to better reflect modern life, which would be grounded in a social model of disability. The current system is really a deficit-based system of assessment. What do you think has changed since 2013 that requires the activities and descriptors to be changed?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Do you agree that that needs to happen in all the spheres that people exist in? With my former Convention of Scottish Local Authorities hat on, I could look at it across the local authority setting, but decisions that are made in different places will impact on people with disabilities in different ways. Does the approach have to be fundamentally embedded across all of Scotland’s public sector?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
I will now go to Ewan MacDonald-Russell for the industry perspective.
We have had the population health perspective explained clearly—it is about zooming out and looking at it from that population health perspective and not, perhaps, from the perspective of individual groups of people.
What can industry do to support healthy options for people who experience food insecurity and who find themselves in those food deserts and being serviced by those smaller shops that—as David narrated—fall out of scope? What can industry do to support people to make the best choices?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Finally, is the Government going to monitor any impacts on inequalities and then bring that work back to the Parliament for scrutiny? It is really important that we understand the impacts of the regulations, positive and negative, on individuals who have disabilities and how they access food.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Professor Johnstone, I will ask you about the impact, too. Looking at individuals who have health issues or disabilities, is there any concern that the regulations could have not only a positive impact but maybe even a negative impact? I am thinking about individuals who are neurodivergent and have associated health issues such as avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; they might be reliant on foods that come under HFSS guidance and would therefore be subject to the restrictions. Is there any concern in that space?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you. It was very short.