The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1225 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I want to spend a bit of time exploring the independent review into ADP and the on-going ADP case reviews. In response to the committee’s pre-budget report, the Scottish Government said that it will
“explore how reporting on ADP spending can better reflect its role in supporting disabled people”.
Will you expand on what that work will involve?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Elena Whitham
I agree with you. Finding out that one of the drivers was the increase in state pension age was a bit of a surprise; I had not even considered that. It was interesting to see that in the report.
What is the Scottish Government’s estimate of the cost of implementing the recommendations of the independent review of ADP? To what extent will cost be the deciding factor in the Scottish Government’s response to the review?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Elena Whitham
That is helpful. One of the key themes in evidence that the committee received was that ADP does not always reflect some conditions, such as more unusual or fluctuating conditions. You have mentioned the eligibility criteria, one of which is the over 50 per cent rule. The University of the West of Scotland has shared experiences of people with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, which is one of those more unusual conditions. There is evidence that there is limited awareness of that among case managers. Is there money in the budget for training and guidance for case managers to deal with more unusual cases? Is the over 50 per cent rule being looked at in considering Edel Harris’s recommendations?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Elena Whitham
That is helpful and very reassuring.
Finally, the fiscal sustainability delivery plan set out measures intended to have a positive impact on public finances, which included consideration of whether ADP reviews are operating as intended. Cabinet secretary, do you expect the review of ADP reviews to identify any potential savings? How will that be balanced with ensuring that the principles set out in the social security legislation will still be applied and adhered to?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Do our other witnesses agree that there is no way to achieve parity without the extension of voting rights?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
I note that we still have religious reps with voting rights on our councils, which is an issue for some.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Do you agree that everybody who is on an IJB, whether or not they have voting rights, once they leave that sphere and go back to their communities and organisations, is still held accountable for the decisions that have been taken by those who have the voting rights?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
Individual healthcare settings still have that very structured hierarchical system in place.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Elena Whitham
How can we shift the culture so that anyone in that setting feels empowered to call out problems as they see them and that they have protection? At the heart of the issue are employees and workers—and, indeed, patients—feeling that they cannot speak out or that, if they do, they are not listened to. How do you foresee our driving the cultural shift that needs to happen?