The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1260 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
I would like to explore the concept of the slippery slope, which is often spoken about. Indeed, Care Not Killing’s written submission states that
“any limit other than prohibition is arbitrary and ripe for challenge.”
I will ground my initial question in Scotland—I am thinking about our institutions and the way in which the bill could be enacted. Do the witnesses agree that any future expansion of the eligibility criteria for assisted dying would have to be subject to the scrutiny of the Parliament? We can perhaps start with Gordon Macdonald, as I referenced your written submission.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do the witnesses have any views on whether any amendments could be made to prevent a broadening of the law once it was in place to prevent such challenges?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
My final question is about the assertion that the bill normalises assisted dying and that numbers could increase on the back of that. From the recent figures from Canada, we can all see that increasing numbers of citizens are using their right to an assisted death. How would you come back on the assertion that that expansion of uptake is evidence of a slippery slope as well?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Do other witnesses want to come in on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Does any of the witnesses have any argument as to why there is a difference in the way that the law was enacted in Canada and the challenges that arose there versus, as Aly Thomson set out, the different legislative landscape in Scotland?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Caveating everything that you have put into that answer, I took from it that the matter would have to come back in front of the Parliament should there be any changes—unless those changes came from a challenge to a court having made a decision on that basis.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
When any legislation is enacted, there will always be a period of review—as you rightly pointed out, one is built into the bill—to consider what can change as practice develops over time.
Would anybody else like to put across their thoughts about the slippery slope argument? I will hand back to the convener after that, because I am conscious of time.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you very much.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Elena Whitham
Good morning, panel members. First, I remind the committee of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which notes that I am a member of the Humanist Society of Scotland.
A common argument against assisted dying is that it would be the start of a slippery slope, either to an increasing number of people having an assisted death, or to more permissive laws, with expanded eligibility and fewer safeguards. I would like to explore the slippery slope argument with the witnesses. How do you respond to assertions that human rights challenges to the bill are likely and will inevitably lead to an expansion of the legislation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Elena Whitham
Do we understand why the PDS is struggling to attract dentists? Is there an issue with the limitations on what they can do in practice versus what other dentists can do in private settings?