Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 29 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1260 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Food Standards Scotland and the First National Good Food Nation Plan

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Elena Whitham

Thank you. That is very helpful.

Let us stick with the issues of food safety and food processing. I was interested to read in the meeting papers that, according to the most recent lab report data that is available, the detection rates for food-borne pathogens have remained static during the past five years. Is there any information about why that is? Is it because we are getting better at detecting those pathogens, or is there still an issue with food processing that has caused the number of pathogens to remain static over the past five years?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Food Standards Scotland and the First National Good Food Nation Plan

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Elena Whitham

I am part of the cross-party group on food, and we are very aware of the big, important issues, such as the capturing of counterfeit vodka and the court case on the misrepresentation of tea.

You have addressed my next question, which was about collaborative working with the Food Standards Agency and others. What are your future priorities for food crime, and are they aligned with those of the Food Standards Agency?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Elena Whitham

It is helpful for us to understand that the code will seek to flesh out the scenarios, because we do not want to scenario plan today and think about different instances in which it could be applied. The information should be contained in the guidance and the code to give operators an understanding of how they should balance human rights and look at each situation before they come to conclusions.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 February 2026

Elena Whitham

Further changes could come forward when you are looking at the review mechanisms and processes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Petitions

Meeting date: 10 February 2026

Elena Whitham

I agree with my colleagues. We have fulfilled the petitioner’s request to look into the issue in depth. Given what is contained in the petition about the lack of a diagnosis and the consequences that that can have on somebody’s life, the next committee should have an on-going look at the issue. However, as I say, we have fulfilled the petitioner’s request.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Elena Whitham

Good morning, cabinet secretary. I want to spend a bit of time exploring the independent review into ADP and the on-going ADP case reviews. In response to the committee’s pre-budget report, the Scottish Government said that it will

“explore how reporting on ADP spending can better reflect its role in supporting disabled people”.

Will you expand on what that work will involve?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Elena Whitham

I agree with you. Finding out that one of the drivers was the increase in state pension age was a bit of a surprise; I had not even considered that. It was interesting to see that in the report.

What is the Scottish Government’s estimate of the cost of implementing the recommendations of the independent review of ADP? To what extent will cost be the deciding factor in the Scottish Government’s response to the review?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Elena Whitham

That is helpful. One of the key themes in evidence that the committee received was that ADP does not always reflect some conditions, such as more unusual or fluctuating conditions. You have mentioned the eligibility criteria, one of which is the over 50 per cent rule. The University of the West of Scotland has shared experiences of people with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, which is one of those more unusual conditions. There is evidence that there is limited awareness of that among case managers. Is there money in the budget for training and guidance for case managers to deal with more unusual cases? Is the over 50 per cent rule being looked at in considering Edel Harris’s recommendations?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Elena Whitham

That is helpful and very reassuring.

Finally, the fiscal sustainability delivery plan set out measures intended to have a positive impact on public finances, which included consideration of whether ADP reviews are operating as intended. Cabinet secretary, do you expect the review of ADP reviews to identify any potential savings? How will that be balanced with ensuring that the principles set out in the social security legislation will still be applied and adhered to?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 5 February 2026

Elena Whitham

Thank you.